Who would be your replacement for Ronny?

I said for the most part. It's not civilized when it comes to you though. You have dug yourself into a hole and have really digged your heels in. You are unwilling to have a rational debate about Deila. You still wave the wee cheerleading flag because you backed him from the start. Grow up and stop being so stubborn.

There is one other poster on here like that and I think he is obligated to post in the way he does because he is related to a board member or something but * sake, tell the * truth and just admit that we have a disaster managing us.

Also dont expect a reply either my times too valuable to waste going * for tat with you. G'luck.

 

The reason I called Lennon a board puppet (and I still feel the same) was for the way he claimed certain elements were "not real Celtic fans" (or something along those lines) for singing rebs at games.

 

That is why he was originally hired though because he would put up with interference which he did. The minute he started to go into business for himself and resist the policy he had to quit because his position was untenable.

We are in the position now where experienced football men will pull in the opposite direction than the suit sanctioned policy. Surely you can see the danger in this?

 

You were asked a question that included discussion about people OTHER than Deila.

You have refused to answer, simply because you are unable - which is strange considering you are the master of all knowledge, and *-like.

Don't bother responding, because you'll be doing me the favour of not wasting my time attempting to decently reply to some upstart with as much knowledge of footballing matters at Celtic Park as a slug has of nuclear physics.

Have a nice day x

 

For once I am in agreement. Sort of. Lennon definitely towed the company line on occasion.

 

Think that's a load of * tbh.

 

So much for not replying

 

Of course it is.

 

If Ronny was to go I really like the idea of Michael O'Neill, though it'll be after the Euro's obviously.

 

It's not though. I was Lennons biggest backer on here but I will give it straight all the time. I have no time for revisionism and propaganda. The original reason why Lennon was hired was because he was a rookie. His success turned him into Frankensteins monster for the board because what he wanted directly threatened their policy. Ultimatums ended up on the table and he ended up walking and we hired a gump to replace him.

 

It's a lot of * because you're making the board sound like Vladimir Romanov.

 

I think Michael O'Neill would like a crack at world cup qualification surely.

 

David Moyes is still available

 

* "Frankenstein's monster"

Can we ban this clown again?

 

You might not like how it sounds but thats how you see it if you dont dress it up. I dont see it that exact way but we have a policy that has good elements but is fundamentally wrong. This policy was dictated to by suits. Those suits will look for a manager to implement their policy. So the suits are setting the football policy and hiring a manager to oversee their vision. Do you think this will maximize what our first team squad is capable of?

 

See if he goes & Collins replaces him

Him, Collins and Kennedy should be out the door first thing tomorrow morning. Along with 80% of the players.

 

Thomas Schaaf or Lucien Favre. Ronny stays as assistant. Collins and Kennedy out

 

I'd go for Brendan Rodgers. Been a while without much speculation on him. He'd implement a similar style but hopefully be more flexible and do the basics first.

* knows, who would want to manage this group of half-hearted pansies?

 

Brendan for me too