THIS IS WHY WE ARE 'PARANOID'!

its certainly more open this season but its been happening. 2003 anyone?

 

It certainly has been happening over the years (Was at it's worst in the 50's & 60's), but never as blatant nor frequent as this season. There's only so many 'honest mistakes' that can go in favour of one team without bias being a major factor.

 

What exactly did I say that gives my post no credability? I pointed out that your post was typical of a hun, I didn't say you were though so you jumped to that conclusion all by yourself which begs the question, why are you so eager to defend yourself?...

Also, in my post, I then went on to point out that this thread is for talking about the decisions by officials that have went against us (and other SPL teams) and the rather generous decisions which have gone in Rangers favour, not Tony Mowbray's mishandling of the team.

Finally, at no point in my post did I call you a hun, however given that you've made such a staunch defence of your original post by calling me "paranoid" and implying that I'm less of a fan than you, I'll say it loud and clear...

I BELIEVE YOU ARE A HUN.

Enjoy your stay.
:bbpd:

 

Please read "Celtic's paranoia all in the mind" by Tom Campbell, then see what you make of the paranoi labels!!

 

Remember, those were the days before TV replays and detailed analysis. The only way you could get a good idea of what happened was by reading the newspapers reports or going to see it yourself. Who knows what might have gone on?

 

Now i dont know if scotty the tim is a hun and i dont care. But i do find it odd that a celtic fan would label another celtic fan paranoid re referee bias. For as long as ive been watching celtic ive seen it. My ma and da can remember it way way back aswell. In fact i dont know any celtic fan who doesnt KNOW this to be true.

They were caught red handed with cadetes registration. Jim Farry had to resign. McCann took them on. Cesar has recently publicly said it. An ex ref admitted it. I mean there are conspiracy nuts and there a real conspiracy's (back and to the left). Maybe you are an anti conspiracy nut?

 

Where was this? Id like to know for future reference.

 

Yup, he resigned, but remember, there were others involved in the whole Cadete incident whom are still very much active within the SFA to this day. Farry was merely the martyr.

The SFA is corrupt, right to it's very core and NOONE could sway me to think otherwise.

 

Not sure lad but i definitely heard it on this forum in the last few days. It may be in this very thread.

Somebody names the ref and said he was a quest speaker at a rangers do where he was gloating about * celtic over the years.

 

Huns cheating?!
[YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oYQRBxZ5o7c [/YOUTUBE]

 

Read please. Its about gordan smith ex rangers player and current head of the sfa. Pay particular attention to the title of his book. This has to stop.

‘There is an agenda against Rangers over sectarianism’ says SFA chief | Scotland - Times Online

 

"It's rangers for me"The head of the SFA, you can't make this stuff up :bbpd:

 

How unfunny is Limmy ffs.

 

ffs I got to that i "it's rangers for me"and shut the link...Him and every other clown in "the establishment"are giving our team a big fck you

 

A lecturer at my college (a Dundee Utd fan) was slaughtering a couple of huns in my class about the SFA, decisions and just cheating in general this morning. Was classic.

 

Funnier than you :bbpd:. Hunners funnier than you :bbpd:

 

smith needs shot

 

I'LL get the IRA onto it!!!

 

Always tv evidence against celtic

sorry if there is already a thread on this,but why is it when a celtic player is involved in a foul off the ball,it is immediately highlighted and the player in question is dragged up before the Scummy football association beaks? now dont know if it is the same here,but for example in england,gerrard elbowed someone off the ball and it was not seen nor mentioned in the referees report.therefore he cant be pulled up by the english fa.yet here? not being para,but elbows mcCulloch,and forearm smash boyd get away with this week in week out! no tv videos getting dragged out after those matches! more recently a hibs player,dont quote me think it was bamba,complained that he had been "assaulted" by boyd,and he was dismayed as it had been spotted and boyd only got a yellow! bougherra is another,ive seen guys jailed for lesser attacks on folk. but to highlight rasmussen (guy was * tugging his jersey and trying to pull his shorts down),fair enough shouldnt have elbowed him,but more was made of that than clancy trying to break his leg. now i gaurantee,if rasmussen hadnt been involved in this incident,clancy would not be getting tried via video evidence.thoughts?