THIS IS WHY WE ARE 'PARANOID'!

100% agree. And about the agenda bit too.

 

spot on

 

It's just so blatantly obvious now,

 

But the decisions in question wouldn't of guarenteed us the points. We have being done in three old firm games but as i said who's to say what would of happened had we got the penalty at ibrox. Would we have won the game had fortune's goal stood? Lets not forget rangers have had a few bad decisions themselves.

 

Listen mate it's as simple as this.

We might have scored the chances we might have not, BUT NOT GETTING PENS AND GETTING GOOD GOALS CHOPPED OFF ARE GOING TO SERIOUSLY DECREASE OUR CHANCES AREN'T THEY ffs

 

Raw deal for 50 years | The Sun |Home Scotland|Scottish Sport|SPL

Big billy tells it like it is.

 

I honestly feel as if I'm being laughed at directly in the face off these *.

There's so much corruption all around the world in the realm of football, yet the meeja and SFA will have you believe that you're incredibly niave to think that it could happen in Scotland...I'd say, you'd have to be incredibly niave to NOT think that something was going on, especially given the events of this season.

 

Aye, it's very much a coinsidence that all these bad decisions just happen to have built up in the season where they really need the cash winning the SPL brings

 

Obviously he is paranoid like the rest of us.

 

It dosen't really help when your manager is too much of a * bag to back up the club and the supporters when asked about the situation.

 

Peter Lawell or John Reid may have asked Mowbray to remain hush-hush on the matter as we've already seen that Celtic are preparing to bring a case forward to the SFA with regards to the *-poor refereeing shenanigans.

If Mowbray were to stoke the flames before Celtic present their case, then that may well go against us.

I can see this being blown WIDE open...and I can't wait! :icon_mrgreen:

 

I seriously don't know what you 'can't wait' for. The only thing I am waiting for is the SFA throwing out the case and punishing Celtic for false accusal.

What really annoys me more than anything is the countless number of Celtic fans that say things like ''we probably wouldn;t have won anyway even if the ridiculous decisions didn't go against us''

Am I missing something here? Am I right in thinking that you feel that since we played so poorly we deserve a blatant bias against us from the referee?

 

there are 2 reasons this could be happening
1 the sfa are helping rangers win the league (to ease there money troubles )
2 we are being treat the same as every other team

my opinion is that number 1 is the best bet (let the scum go into admin)

 

2 = 1 here too.

 

theres no point in arguing with you if you're just going to turn round with a load of what ifs. you're saying what if we'd got the decisions we don't know what would have followed that so its therefor irrelevant and us not taking our chances is to blame. one recurring question, what would have happened if we had taken one of the chances to level it in the earlier game at ibrox? what would have happened had sammy scored one of his chances at the game at parkhead? what if fortune had scored on sunday instead of dragging it by the post? what if we'd scored against dundee united in the game samaras' goal was dissalowed and we never got the penalty? the game at falkirk what if we hadn't conceded the 3rd goal? you get the picture? we don't know. you have no more way of knowing what impact these changes would have had on the outcome than with refereeing decisions so why discount one and make an issue of the other? personally the falkirk one for example i'm pretty confident if we hadn't conceded that third goal they wouldn't have scored it at a later point so its safe to say we would have won. no more so though than saying that if mcdonalds goal hadn't been inexplicably chopped off which would have made it 4-3 in the same game we would have won.

in an ideal world we would go out and steamroller teams 5 nil every week playing free flowing passing football but in the real world thats not going to happen. games are going to be close and just as a howler from the keeper or missed chance from a forward will go a long way to deciding results so will poor referee decisions. if you can't see or accept that then thats up to you i guess but just don't expect to find many who agree with you.

 

You could write the Huns bad decisions this season on a packet of * fs!


Those sort of deluded opinions are lauded on Rangers-Media mate (As they try to convince themselves that they haven't been handed the league by the refs), not here.


The facts and video evidence are there for all to see mate, get a grip.

 

My opinion too.

 

This is exactly what we would have and should have been doing in the first half of the season but just couldnt score. The amount of chances we created in these games but couldnt convert was ridiculous, and that was down to our strikers and some unbelievable goalkeeping displays by some average keepers.

 

What are we saying is there bias or are they just honest mistakes? My memory is not as good as you guys but outwith the three old firm games and the falkirk game i can't think of many other decisions that have went against us this year. I know how had we got the right decisons we would of had more points in the old firm games but i like to think there is a bit more too it than officials.