The Sun's Attack on Celtic

How can they STILL be allowed to get away with this?
These guys are not even journalists, they wouldn't last a minute in the office of a proper paper!

 

We wont sign Boyd.
1. The fans dont want him
2. The club dont want him
3. He is a die hard hun
The issue should not really be an issue.

There is a bias in the Scottish media against Celtic. those who cant see this are bleeding hearts who have not yet awoken to the FACTS. Check out this website: Celtic Paranoia

Now a fella got slated back there for saying he would never want that hun * at Parkhead. Have i gone mad or what. I honestly cannot get my head around the fact that people would accept him, i really cant. If we signed him i would not enter the stadium or buy another piece of merchandise while he was under our employment.

 

Hate the HUN

 

Band On, that says it all for me

 

Let me first say I don't buy the sun, wouldn't wipe my * with it, I buy the Daily Record because I'm in my 50's and old habits die hard (lol)....A close family member of mine spoke with a current first team rangers player two weeks ago who told him that Chris Boyd had been sounded out about coming to CP....and that Chris Boyd had not dismissed the interest and had been pondering what he should do IF a concrete offer had come in. This was before any of this was printed by the Sun.....and when the story was told to me I said "Pish". Take from this what you will....I am only saying what I know....I don't want to say the circumstances of where or how the story was told....but I am guaranteeing you this rangers player was NOT joking as far as my relative was concerned.

 

in what way possiable is this bias against Celtic?

 

There is a bias against celtic. There has been books written on the subjuct. Everyone knows it, ask Billy McNeill. Earlier in the thread people were assuming there was no bias against us and i was addressing them. Just check the link from my post.

 

When was the last time we had a redtop critcise the way the Huns "always gobble up the words pumped out through the official club media", despite the long, long list of bullshit spouted by Rangers under Murray and now under Johnston.

Christ, the redtops themselves are notoriously predictable in their slavish acceptance and promotion of any positive spin from Ibrox without any kind of due investigation of even basic facts.

If we marched our way into a mountain of debt, got taken over by the bank, became the subject of an HMRC tax-dodging investigation and had our star striker allegedly talking to Rangers, these people would want a National Day of Gloating in rememberance. Some of these "journalists" have been touting a man facing 300+ tax-evasion and racketeering charges as a potential buyer for * sake.

 

my question was to how on earth linking us with a player is bias

 

I didnt say it was and i thought i made that clear. Read through the whole thread

 

mmmm seems the story has fizzled away again like most ppl thought , also least we know boyd wont be at rangers next season,
although boyd might want to stay in glasgow knowing tennents is the sponsor now !

 

It's paranoia by Celtic fans. Fans say alot worse on here but when something is written by a paper they hate it. Simple.

Ignore it if you don't like it

 

It amazes me that these papers continue to write offensive rubbish and people on here are still reading them... you shouldn't have to suggest a boycott - WHY IS ANYONE GIVING MONEY TO EITHER THE SUN OR THE RECORD?

 

Where have I heard that line before?

 

You didnt ,your just Para mate.:icon_mrgreen:

 

News papers write what ever they feel will shift copies. They're not bias in anyway. Yes some of their writters like BBJ and hately are obviously going to write about "their" teams. Celtic fans call the record the daily Ranger. Rangers fans call it the Daily rebel.
Can't both be right.

 

...but huns are idiots.