Penalty Incident

So you don't believe that there's been a sinister agenda against us for years? Why wouldn't he?

 

I believe we have had an ongoing problem with the SFA, but i dont believe there has been a secret pact by referees to give us bad calls.I do believe some individuals may have been biased though, but i dont believe its a conspiracy, no.

Dont quite understand your second question.

 

Completely out of order......you must be a hun!
It was 60/40 at best!(as the evidence of the poll clearly shows!):bbpd:

(Ridiculous i have to say this now, but obviously only joking!!!)

 

Fair enough.

My second question is given the proven corruption in the SFA (and there'll be more to come) and the hounding of Catholic refereee Steve Conroy, why wouldn't Willie Collum toe the line?

 

yes that was a penalty and i hope that those ayrshire * * go down with their bigot cousins. * them. theyre as bad as the huns as far as i am concerned and willie collum has proved once again that he is a massive tool

 

Penalty-Yes

Should have won the game well in advance though so im not going to berate the ref when it was the teams fault not to score in 90 mins.

Well done killie tbh, they wanted it more and it showed.

Double is still on

 

Well im not aware of the Steve Conroy situation, but i cant believe Collum would know of an agenda and keep quiet.I give people the benefit of the doubt, and to me, he is a guy trying to be a referee, but not at the expense of his integrity.Without concrete evidence, i cant believe he would "toe the line", if toeing the line meant deliberately conspiring against one club, just for the sake of being a top referee.
Just how i feel.If it transpired he was a crook etc, id have happily eat humble pie, but i naturally hate the concept of mob rule and kangaroo courts, so until such a time as he is shown to be guilty of corruption, i will always look to see him as fair.

 

*, why ddint i just post this!


:icon_mrgreen:

 

Toeing the line doesn't mean he has any conspiracy, it means he doesn't want to make ripples in the water shall we say?

A real crook? I would like to think a former R.E teacher wouldn't be, but his employers are.

 

Because its not controversial enough

 

Well i dont believe that, but you may well be right.

Hawl you!:bbpd:

Do you know, i really dont try and be controversial, although i know people dont believe me.
I have seen a hundred others comment in here agreeing with me, or even further beyond my opinion, but as Cha3 says, i seem to antagonise some people!

Anyway, on reflection, i think it was a penalty, but i think his exaggerated fall cost him it, as it may have gave Collum the impression it was a con attempt!

 

Well maybe you need a wee sleep before posting * on here about stokes diving while saying he was clipped honestly if the ref is not 100% sure its a pen yet still books the player for diving does that not tell you his mind is already made up

 

If that happens in the middle of the park then I bet he'd give a foul. In saying that I do think he could have stayed on his feet

 

But why should he if hes been fouled players do it all the time lets not kid ourselves.Was this incident any less of a foul than the broadfoot penalty which collum never even * seen

 

As he's one on one if he stays on his feet that's why he shouldn't have went to ground. However if we got a pen against us for that I'd have no complaints about it. Anywhere else on the park and it's a foul

 

Agreed Minty. The penalty incident looks a bit soft. A lot of refs would probably call play on if it happened in the middle of the park.

Wouldn't blame Forster though, the ball had too much pace, don't think he could of got to it as he was protecting the near post. Kelvin Wilson should of done better though. He just stopped. If he kept going he would of got to the ball before the Kilmarnock player.

Alas it was a bad day...still

SPL Champs in waiting

 

can not believe some people saying it is not a penalty. its a tackle from behind , there is contact , he doesnt win the ball. ok stokes wasnt halfed but it was still a standard penalty. terrible decision by a hun rat.

 

If this had happened the other way round, would we still be saying its a penalty? Would we *! Stokes should have hit when he had a chance, his last resort was to hit the deck when he made an * of it.

Players never done enough yesterday, to be expected with this team every time they are under a bit of pressure. Hopeless.

Treble *, only the players and bad tactical decisions by Lennon to blame.

Get over it and move on.

 

The bolded part is complete and utter horse *.

The rest I agree with.

 

If this had happened the other way round, would we still be saying its a penalty? Would we *! Stokes should have hit when he had a chance, his last resort was to hit the deck when he made an * of it.

Players never done enough yesterday, to be expected with this team every time they are under a bit of pressure. Hopeless.

Treble *, only the players and bad tactical decisions by Lennon to blame.

Get over it and move on.