How Do You Think The Club Should Deal With Leigh Griffiths?

But your original answer to the 'stupid hypothetical' question (you had a quick edit) was it would be nothing to do with us. The question I put to you was as it was done on a players own time, should we shrug our shoulders and not comment on it? Still not answered it.

 

Your the troll calling being an agressive nutcase calling people huns. People saying he should be sacked should see what other higher profile players have managed to get away with.

 

You think the club should do nothing if we had a paedophile on our books as its a 'police matter' and 'they should only be judged by what they do on the park'. * * indeed.

 

Is that some sort of riddle?

 

You would want the club to come out and comment on a player being a pedo ? What could they say ? * sake. I would rather the police just locked him up tbh.

 

I don't really care what a club like Chelsea let their players away with. We are Celtic.

 

Paedophilia and yer wee smiley face why don't you * off to another forum ya rodent *

 

Your still skirting round the question. Should we say 'it was his own time nothing to do with us?'

Yes or no.

You made that initial comment, stick by your convictions.

 

If they are a beast then obviously should be judged for being a beast.

 

Where the * did I say he should be sacked,I have never condemned Griffiths he is innocent until otherwise,just as like the law of the land :bbpd:

 

This * is at it

 

So you're backtracking from your original stance that players should only be judged by what they do on the pitch? What do you think the club should do about it, pass it off as a police matter?

 

* up, he's been racist before & called somebody a * refugee. If it was some hun singing about Jon Daly and telling him "go home you * refugee" you'd be up in arms. And aye Leigh Griffiths is a * world-beater himself is he

 

I'll be away cleaning windows then

 

* sake its not going to happen. What a pointless argument.

 

We all know it's hypothetical. But answer the question. That's the fourth time you've been asked. Your inital argument was a player shouldn't be judged on what he does in his own time. Or were you just trolling?

 

I never * said that,and that isn't my quote

 

You either think players should only be judged by what they do on the pitch or you don't.

 

It's not pointless. You said that Celtic players are only judged by what they do on the pitch. Someone then gave an even more extreme example where even you would judge them on their non-footballing activities (happy though you seemingly are to turn a blind eye to public displays of xenophobia and racism!). The existence of this counterexample proves you were wrong.

 

5th time you've been asked Spellcheck.