Honest Mistakes Thread 2016/17 onwards.

It’s a penalty.

Even if you want to think about it further up the field. Say Starfelt comes across in a covering tackle and Sakala * the ball past him. If Starfelt has slid through the line of where the player is expected to run and doesn’t get the ball, then if Sakala can’t put his foot down because Starfelt has made an unsuccessful challenge, if it results in Sakala going to ground then it’s a foul.

In this case Starfelt has made an unsuccessful challenge and Sakala has pulled the ball back. Sakala goes to put his foot down at the first available spot, it just happens that Starfelt is there making an unsuccessful challenge and his foot comes down on his foot, wiping him out.

It’s a 100% a penalty. It looked a penalty live, and it looks a penalty on replay. VAR is never overturning that.

 

Did u see Sakalas reaction after winning it? He * knew he cheated to get it

 

Don't know how to move the gif from WhatsApp 2 here so just a still

 

Yeh another wee * decision going under the radar because tavernier a was * blood that was a fifty fifty collision so by law should have been a corner if he’s saying it’s a foul to tavernier then he has to book maeda because then if it’s seen as a foul and tavernier is bloodied it’s endangering the opponent if he’s calling it a foul making up * and bending the rules and explanations as they go along


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Said it earlier juranovic is to blame for letting his man sneak past with a whimper if your no last man you take him down as if your going for ball boom free kick but less dangerous than the position he got himself in the box


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

How hard is it to conceive that starfelt didn’t make contact with sakala ….. sakala watches him slide past and last second throws his leg into buy it we can’t expect our players to stop doing their job because players try to buy penalties and free kicks it’s upto the ref and the var team to stop these things happening in football otherwise what’s the point in having defenders


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

The Oriley one for me is the smoking gun as that was outside the box clearly yet they still said pen all other ones they keep changing statements and reason why to give and not to give it’s * depressing


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Might want to delete that second photo. Has somebodies number in it

 

Starfelts trying to prevent Sakala squaring it to a team mate that in that space would have had good odds at scoring


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

This is a frustrating topic with people making things up. Watch the video.

Sakala didn't throw his leg in the slightest or buy the penalty. He stopped the ball to turn inside. His foot was directly behind the ball. He made zero motion towards Starfelt. His movement was natural.

Starfelt missed the ball and took Sakala's foot from under him.

It is a penalty. It doesn't help our case of proving how many wrong decisions are going against us when some of you can't accept correct decisions against us.

 

His foot literally slides past Sakala and is in that spot before Sakala is if he slides and Sakala leg is their and planted the. That’s starfelt taking Sakala foot big difference


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Also sickening that certain posters on here want to make the discussion about starfelt rather than keep the pressure on about the fact we got a perfectly good pen shout knocked back utter deflection


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Ok for arguments sake, if Sakala dinked the ball over Starfelt’s slide and then stepped on his foot and got taken down, is that a penalty? Of course it is.

 

Lol, mind readers in here now. Could it just be as simple as he is celebrating getting a penalty, minus the he knew he cheated?

 

If that’s the case then why is he holding his thigh that wasn’t even touched ? Feigning injury and contact stops to celebrate then back to holding thigh as if to portray that starfelt made reckless contact ….. what would happen if he red carded starfelt on the back of that


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Naw coz he was holding his leg like he stood on a landmine whilst celebrating.

 

Lad basically did the splits in an uncontrolled way at speed. He might not have ended up being injured, but a substantial amount of stress would have gone through his body.

Done something similar while snowboarding, high impact twisting and turning, thought I’d done my knee while it was happening, but after a few minutes I was good to go.

It’s sport boys, the fact this decision has created so much discussion that it may or may not be a penalty just shows this isn’t the decision we should be taking to the SFA. The handball on the other hand, is what we should be hammering them over.

 

Waiting for the mad excuse your gonna make up now for when kent punched Scott brown few years back as of yesterday rangers players can do no wrong according to you


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

I call it how I see it, I put the specs down. Calling that penalty out dilutes the shockers that go against us, you do yourself and the club an injustice by doing it.