Honest Mistakes Thread 2016/17 onwards.

Apparently you can.. So you're telling me 100% hand on heart if it happens the other end you're not wanting a penalty?

 

Read your posts back and you'll soon see. You're coming away with some * to justify this hun penalty.

 

Nope.. I'm having a civil conversation with another poster about a penalty without insulting him.. something you seem incapable of.

 

110% starfelt never touched him

 

Fair enough.. do you agree Starfelt doesn't get the ball and is out of control on the ground and there is contact with the hun?

 

the only important part of that was did he make contact with the hun ,which he didnt

 

Stonewaller for us after Goldson' save of the match , there's is never a pen but it'll always be given against us and Starfeldt should never dive in there anyway the * clown.

 

I think you're spot on here...I've seen more blatant cheating than yesterday but yesterday's refereeing was very subtle and up there the more you look at it .

 

Watching it at the time yesterday I think Beathun was being told to look at it and you could clearly see him mouthing " it's no a penalty " he made the call not to look at it.

 

It's done in the back of a van on the side of the road? Surely that's no actual VaR?
I'd have expected it to be a room in Hampden as a centralised location.

Sent from my M2012K11AG using Tapatalk

 

I've yet to see it again since the one replay sky showed at the time.

But my view of it was that Starfelt was a bit late, but sakala foot lands on Starfelt which then makes him do the splits.

It's not a foul by Starfelt as much as it's really not a stamp by sakala.

My point is, it's a none event anywhere else on the pitch. The usual nonsense of a team in blue and something happening in the box results in this being a penalty.

The worrying thing is, VaR didn't * look at it and I've yet to see the replay again - anywhere - is it being ignored?

Sent from my M2012K11AG using Tapatalk

 

Slightly reminds me of the CCV and devine incident against hearts. Where both stretch their leg out to get the ball, where VaR slows it down and shows that it's devine who kicks CCV boot, but because of the optics, hearts get the penalty


Point, yet again, if that happened anywhere else on the pitch, it's a none event.

Sent from my M2012K11AG using Tapatalk

 

Jackshun is the Daily * thinks we revel in the belief that officials conspire against us at every turn and we are paranoid. The alky * failed to mention the Sakala con job that they got a penalty from. Hun * Jackshun should have a look at tbe stats since VAR was introduced and realize we have every right to be "paranoid".

 

Love the huns trying to say goldson kicked the ball off his hands, lol

 

I suspect Collum told the hun * to go have a look and he just said no need, I had a good view of it.

 

Rangers fans have four different versions of the handball.

Some claiming it clearly didn't touch his hand. It clearly did.

Some say it hit his foot and then his hand. It didn't touch his foot.

Some say he was protecting his face which is allowed. His hands were not out to protect his face. They were also too far away from his body.

Some say it was a penalty. They are correct.

 

?

Sent from my M2007J17G using Tapatalk

 

I get the protecting his face argument to an extent, but the thing is his arms were up and his hands actually pushed the ball up into the air and away. How can that not be a penalty? If it hits him in the face it bounces back and into a dangerous area, so it obviously benefited them having his hands there pushing the ball.

Ridiculous it wasn't looked at.

 

Starfelt instigated the contact. He lunged into a tackle and didn't get the ball.

He stood on Starfelt's foot as Starfelt missed the ball and came through him.

Sakala was always going to put his foot down on that spot of grass. If he got his foot down Starfelt would have taken his leg away. It would be a very clear penalty. He only stood on Starfelt's foot as his foot was where it shouldn't not have been.

The motion and momentum of Starfelt's missed tackle caught Sakala's foot and wiped his leg away.

It was a clear penalty. It's hard to understand why some people can't see that.