'Honest' mistakes 24/25

Seen this a few times and I don't really believe it..

The huns are a total irrelevance to us this season. You never drop points and think oh *, they're back in it....because they're no..

He didn't cheat us to help his team. He just instinctively deployed his bias because of what he is..

 

Yeah a cheating hun loving *

 

Yep, if they don't have a conclusive and concrete view where they can 100% prove that the ball was fully over the line, then they should not be stepping in to over-rule the on field decision.

The game is done now and nothing we can do about it but we should be demanding an explanation and apology if the angle used was not down the line.

 

Did you see VAR made a * of it again in the Hearts game, they gave a St Johnstone goal as offside but now it looks onside from a view they never looked at.

 

That was the goal Newcastle scored against them at SJP, when Arteta went mental afterwards.

This * has been happening for years against Celtic (anybody remember when the official went on strike after Lennon’s comments?)

SFA, and particularly the refs, are happy to penalise us - to support them and try and make the league more competitive.

Bring on a European super league asap please

 

I'm afraid your mate is wrong. He is either spinning you a yarn or he has no idea what he is talking about.
Alan Muir is a bitter Hun. Period. End of Story.
Muir's head is on the chopping block. He is not escaping this one. Long, long overdue too.

 

Like Rodgers said if you're camera footage is not conclusive then you're having a guess at it. And that is it in a nutshell. And we don't need VAR to guess. It's there to cut out any errors. Not * create more

 

It was tongue in cheek but of course league is over …. But theirs alway hope with those tramps


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

I see Ewen Cameron, the Hearts fan, was desperate to jump in and stand up for Hibs by showing a fuzzy still where he claims the ball is out but actually the image is still inconclusive and going by the shadow cast of the ball, remembering a ball is round makes it look like the whole ball is not out.

Honestly, I am not sure why he bothers. A VAR official cannot be certain in those circumstances and therefore the goal should have stood.

 

I think the ball was out, personally speaking, but the fact that we’re still having to have these conversations says an awful lot.

 

See if both the linesman and the ref have initially called the ball out of bounds. Then we could've accepted the fact that the goal couldn't have stood after a VAR check.

And I believe if that was the case then that * Muir would've said "VAR inconclusive, on field decision stands as no goal"

But purely because the on field decision was a goal, that's why he's * guessed. Utter *.

 

Says it all when the BBC * and Boyd are all agreeing that it was a goal.

 

Yep, all factors point towards that being the case.

 

Some one in the crowd bang in the corner on the line has video and on the still balls in majority of the ball might be out but whole ball needs to be out remember


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk