Emile Heskey

wicker boy !! your claiming the guy is and always has been a donkey. thats defo not the case. can bring up all the stats u like but they are all from the english prem and with england. let him hit the spl . even craig beatie could score goals up here

 

Mon lashed out £12M for Emile Heskey. A good player dozen't become a bad player in four years. Heskey is a beast of a player, and probably would score a barrowload of goals in the SPL if used properly.

 

NoTW, so probably pish.

BUT, if there was some truth in it and Villa are willing to throw a couple of million quid... well, I'd think about it, anyway. We need strikers, and for all his fault's Heskey is a better striker than what we have at the moment. A few million quid into the deal could then be directed at signing a Keane or a Bellamy.

 

oniell didny pay £12m for him. he got him for a couple of million because heskey only had 6 months of contract left but he would defo do us a turn

 

Well done. I've noticed you like to take tiny points of peoples arguments and nit-pick at them.

Still doesn't change the fact that his overall contribution is terrible.

 

Have you now...thanks for taking so much time to analyse my posts..

I was merely picking up on a point you made about assists. No need to get upset as i picked one he set-up on the biggest stage of all.

 

hahahahaah didnt that paraguyan goalie score more international goals thann him?

 

" a perfect foil for rooney" its nice to see u have ur own opinion and not just been listening to alan shearer and co on tv. ill take capellos opinion over ur tv opinion any day of the week

 

We're here to discuss Heskey, not each other. Let's keep to the topic at hand here.

 

Wrong. Liverpool paid 12m for him when he was 22 and you can become a bad player in ten years.

 

aye hes played lots more and takes penalties and free-kicks.

 

that goalie has scored more international goals than our whole team has scored

 

I knew someone had paid £12M for Heskey. And I didn't say ten years I said four. My point still stands.

 

If you read back I said he used to be decent and now he's *. He did used to be decent and now he is *. So your point here is that any has-been striker can come up here and bang them in? Just don't think thats true.

 

so because he cant get a game for villa means hes a has been?? and yes any decent striker will score a barrowload up here

 

Heskey catches a lot of flak because he doesn't score goals for England. We aren't going to land a striker who does score regularly for England, are we?

I think Heskey would be a pretty good striker for Celtic. He has that physicality we've been lacking for years, he has plenty of experience playing at the highest level and will be a powerful threat from pieces. Since drawing comparisons with O'Neill's players is in vogue, think of someone in the John Hartson mould.

 

He's a has been because he's scored 20 league goals in his last 4 seasons. And I don't rate him as a decent striker. Was once, but not anymore.

 

The only way I would be happy with Heskey being in the Hoops is if he took a major major paycut, he isnt worth paying 40,000 or more a week.

 

lol! we should sign him instead then! a lot better

 

He is still a decent striker Heskey. He has that physicality that would serve
him well in the SPL, and I reckon he would batter Davie Weir into submission. Fortune is poor in front of goal, and needs one or two touches on the ball, and worse still he couldn't hit a coo on the * with a banjo.