SPFL Celtic V The Huns December 30Th kick off 12:30 Sky Sports Football

Rules say if the player is offside in the build up then the hand ball cannot be given but the Huns reading of this is if var made a mistake in the build up to making the correct decision then the mistake must stand.

Right then.

 

I see Clement has gone full Pedro.

If they gave it and it was offside (which it was), that's an error.

His team is gash and were lucky it was only 2-1.

 

Does it really matter if it was the right decision for the wrong reason?

It shouldn't have been a penalty because he was offside. Why are they complaining?

 

Good for you. I had plenty of doubts right up until the whistle blew.

 

The English game releases a lot of the audio and the phrase "just checking the a-p-p" seems to crop up for nearly all of these decisions. I'd say the Huns are wrong.

 

The same rule was applied at the last World Cup, Belgium vs. Croatia. Ref gave a pen to Croatia, but it was overturned because Lovren's arm and shoulder were offside, and apparently one could score with the shoulder, so that meant offside was given. I was raging back then, but that's the rule.

 

From what point does the VAR check incidents leading to a penalty or goal?
The VAR will only check the attacking possession phase that led to the penalty or goal.

The starting point will be limited to the immediate phase. The VAR may not go back to when the attacking team gained possession.

The VAR will consider the ability of the opposing defence to reset, and the momentum of the attack

 

Will it be used for all offside decisions?

No, only for one of the four match-changing situations: goals; penalty decisions; direct red-card incidents; and mistaken identity.

 

Mind they roundabouts ya orange *. Happy New year aaaaaaaaahahahahaaaaaaaaaa wow mangled and the huns been strangled yeegaa

 

This.

I mean, I guess they are so used to virtually everything being given to them at this point, that when literally any decision, right or wrong, goes against them, the total victim mentality takes over and they will jump up and down, kick up a stink and throw the toys from the pram.

 

I think he's saying they've given the right decision for the wrong reason but he thinks it would be fairer if they'd given the wrong decision for the wrong reason. They really have lost the plot.

 

Live online feed of Sportscene...Will update the SS thread with the pre-record..if I remember lol
https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/live/bbcscotland

 

OK so release the VAR audio of why we didn't get a penalty for the foul on Turnbull.

Release the VAR audio of why the assault on O'Riley wasn't a red card to stirling.

In fact, release the audio communications from the entire game and we'll get answers as to why Walsh was at it all game trying to get huns points.

Every other club in the league should request the VAR audio every week when they play these * then, as they are always being given decisions no one else gets so they all deserve answers as to why the huns get them, but no one gets them against the huns.

If they wanna play that card then we have to hear everything in every game, and I guarantee they won't do that as it'll be damning for the huns.


Had every decision go for them since VAR came in and cry like little babies when the correct decision is gone against them.

Take penalties out of the game and the huns wouldn't even be in second place ffs hahaha

 

You can bet your life if the penalty had been given, we'd never have been shown the offside and it wouldn't have ever come to light.

The right decision was given, doesn't matter how they got their ffs. Look at all the wrong decisions that are given on a weekly basis that the huns benefit from.

Greeting * hahahahaha

 

Aaaaaaaahahahaaaqqq ill gee them a video hahahaaaaa get it * up them yeeehaaaaq

 

VAR worked perfectly at the non-pen.

The problem is caused by the Hun linesman who was at it all day, he failed to make the correct call and flag offside once the ball had gone out of play.

The ball hits AJ on the hand, and could have been a penalty award if the referee spotted it, but he didn't and instead awarded a goal kick.

(The Huns claim handball and VAR are on the case)

Now.......

If the linesman made the (correct) offside call, VAR would have confirmed that call, and we'd restart with a free-kick for the Hun being offside........ but the linesman failed.

If the referee had awarded the penalty for handball, the VAR would have corrected the on-field decision because the hun player was offside and it would have been a clear and obvious error.

HOWEVER........

The on-field referee didn't see the handball and awarded a goal kick.

Conclusion.......

No penalty because he was offside (VAR correct call)

No offside given (VAR correct call as it came to nothing and there was no call to overturn)

No corner awarded (VAR correct not to get involved in decisions about corners or goal kicks)

Game correctly (due to failure of Hun linesman to give offside decision) restarts with a goal kick.

It should be obvious to anyone who understands the rules that what I've described is how that incident played out.........but the Huns and their lackys in the media are used to getting away with it week-in week-out, and are deliberately trying to create a narrative whereby they've been hard done by. It's complete and utter bullshit. The correct decision was reached reasonably quickly despite various elements needed checked. We can only imagine what these entitled and corrupt * would be like if they ever suffered a GENUINE refereeing injustice like the ones we have to put up with on a regular basis.

Dry your eyes ya greetin faced Hun basturds, we beat you fair and * square. We'll enjoy our New Year celebrations now, I hope we've * yours up big time !!

 

Is that goldson and balogun out of their away game to hibs?

Sent from my Pixel 8 Pro using Tapatalk

 

Nah..... rule 16, subsection 90 of the 5Way Agreement, states that "all measures will be taken in order to avoid any punishment for sevco, regardless of how ridiculous it is ".