Bellamy or Zurawski

I would also like to point out in case people forgot, DD is fully underwriting Keane's wages despite what he claims so signing Bellamy would make absolutely no difference on if we had signed Keane or not.

 

Okay , but we don't know this for a FACT. Remember that media can twist things to make us belive that DD is underwriting Keane's wages.

On Bellamy , he's better off where he is. Was a class wee player when we had him but he is injury prone and his big mouth is better off at Blackburn.

 

the bells is obviously better , if majeic was so * hot then he would have all bhoys like me drooling . lets face it ..bells is the complete pro , zurawski is a pretender at the mo.it was a short question & zurawski comes out weak .

both had a 6 mnth viewage & MG has proved nothin

 

I wanted Bellamy to be signed, its all conjecture now, but take Naklamura he is a star, will Zurawski become one, not sure but doubt it. Anyhoo I sure hope he can add to the team, when he gets back, one verygood player that is adding little is Sutton, sell him!

 

Well said m8

 

bells for a pro ,majec for show

 

zurawski seems more of an out and out striker from what i've seen whereas bellamys pace adds a whole different dimension to his game. Give majic a chance to get fit before you go slaggin him though he was * hot before the injury.

 

there can be no divinding line ,

bellamy quality in 6 months , zurawski garbage in 6 months ,its the plain facts

 

You can't say no more than Renegade t said he got it in one Bellamy did do a lot more in 6moons than Zurawski has every done and he also won a Trophy+a winners Medal(Scottish-Cup-2005) to just wished we had kept Craig Bellamy I bet you him+Wee Maloney would be banging in the goals and with Nakamura in Midfield who knows how much goals they would be on coz we had Hartson also and BBJ knows Bellamy's game inside out and Vice Versa with Bellamy

 

The question is would we have got Nakamura and Boruc if we were to sign Bellamy? , no.

 

Bellamy seems better at the moment but i've seen in the past from some videos and stuff how good magic really is. If he can do what i've seen him do he is better than Bellamy.

 

No its not the question, the question is who would you rather have and at this time there is no possible way anyone could say Bellamy wasnt better in his time than Zurawski has been in his time so far. Also, whos to say if we had indeed signed Bellamy that we wouldnt have got Boruc and Nakmura? You cannot possibly say for sure what would have happened if we had got bellamy in the summer.

Your sig is way to big please remove it and check the rules.

 

I don't think my sig is too big at all! But fine i'll remove it!

 

didn't win the league, Bellamy signed, Klos injured...from Feb it looked like we'd walk it

Did Bellamy produce on the final day....no...fast exciting but no Henrik. didn't have that extra bit of class to win titles.

What has he done in the game, what will he do now he is at Balckburn and why didn't the top teams want him...nuff said

 

The fact Zurawski has yet to have had the oppertunity to win anything with Celtic renders the above comment as totaly moronic!

Don't get me wrong i like winning things but i also enjoy admiring my team. I had no respect for Bells as he was an * and i didnt like his attitude towards the game and other players! Zurawski seems like an honest bloke who is oozing with potential. He just needs to gain confidence and show us what he is all about. Its not like we aint seen what he is capable of in the past!

 

I saw them both in Wales-Poland match and Magic looked far more better. I won't vote because it's too early. Let's give Magic some more time to prove his value.

 

bellamy, but it doesn't matter. he's gone, magic is here. he wants to play for the hoops, bellamy obviously didn't . hail hail the celts are here

 

Bellamy kept a out of form Celtic team winning and kept us in the running until the last day where we fell on our sword. Zurawski hasn't done anything by comparison.

Could Would Should is not the question. He could, would, should be a great Celtic player but he hasn't done it because he's been injured and he's injured because he played a match when he was carrying a knock and got crocked.

 

i supose that the language barrier has been taken in 2 account. bellers understood our language, (well i think he did) and zurawski didnt at first and still wont really understand everything. so hes kinda restricted to shouting names and making signs. i hav faith and am sure Magic will come gd! i think they r different class of players, their game styles r different. each is great in their own ways!

 

How is that comment moronic when Bellamy came to Celtic in January-2005 and the football+goals he contrabuted(sorry about the spelling there )was 1st-class m8 and he did win something in the 6-months he was there,(his first medal ever)and the one thing Bellamy had that Zurawski didn't was his age magic is 29 is he not! and Craig Bellamy is only 25 or 26 and his play was brillant,Don't get me wrong I've got nothing against Zurawski but since he played for Poland against England he hasn't been his self not like when he scored his first+second goals for us against Dumfermline m8+he also scored a peach against Aberdeen from a Hartson knock-down just wished I new whats wrong with Zurawski but he is still a good player but in my opinion m8 I would have kept Craig Bellamy and Remember Celtic Never Even offered Bellars a contract could you image Zurawski+Bellamy up-front for Celtic and with Maloney+Nakamura+Keane in midfield that would have been some team and I bet you anything m8 we would have scored a lot more goals than now and STILL BE IN THE CL thats my opinion