Nakamura?

Why is he being swept aside for that hasbeen lennon, he does * all in games...

 

I dunno but maybe its something got to do with his defensive capablities not being good.

 

naka did the buisness when he came on today

 

The old saying "dont change a winning team"

 

I can assure the GS will use him again soon. He has creativity. He's the best in SPL at the ability.

 

as he can't speak English he can't kiss *

 

Keane and Lenny have been good in the last couple games, not sure what they was like today though??

 

In my opinion GS didn't want to change a winning team but when thing were getting worse in second half he had to make a substitution an let naka play.
Celtic scored all the goals after Naka coming on the pitch and I think it speaks for itselfs.

 

lenny was great 2day, he looked so fit, covered so much ground and was surprisingly far forward for him! he was on because he obviously deserved 2 b on duhhhhh. honestly just be glad that the time played well and won. there r things that need built on and thats wats being done the now. honestly.... Theres only one Neil Lennon. solid in defense and great vision 2day ma bhoy well in!

 

Look at the facts.

Lennon had a good game today while he played.
Nakamura had a good game today while he played.

We scored 0 goals while Lennon was on the park.
We scored 3 goals while Nakamura was on the park.

It's an easy decision... GS shouldn't even need to think twice

 

Hey... don't argue about that! We should be happy we have so strong midfield line recently - Naka, Keano, Lennon, Maloney, Petrov...
It's the thing that makes teams strong - at least two good players for one position. In my opinion GS knows what he does... sometimes it's Naka who shoul play and well sometimes it's Neil....

 

Correction:

We scored 3 goals while Lennon was on the park.
We scored 3 goals while Nakamura was on the park.

Lennon never came off so you cant make that comparison unless im forgetting something but I can only remember one substution and that was Naka for BBJ

 

sorry, i worded it wrong...

We scored 0 goals while Nakamura was off the park
We scored 3 goals while Nakamura was on the park

Dont know why I said lennon...

 

u could have said, we scored 0 goals when keano was on the park
and then three when naka came on

u could have said, we scored 0 goals when wilson was on the park
and then three when naka came on

u could have said, we scored 0 goals when telfer was on the park
and then three when naka came on (telfer was rather * 2day tbh, toooo many mistakes, and then he wanted boruc 2 throw him the ball instead of get it up the field...)

u could have said, we scored 0 goals when hatson was on the park
and then three when hartson was off

cant just single lennon out reallllllly (even though it was unintentional!!!). he gives more to us as a team than alot of them do. and when macmanus keano and boruc were shouting at each other that wasnt 2 great... play together as a team, not individuals bhoys!

 

That's what I was trying to say in my previous post

 

Why would we drop Wilson, Telfer or Hartson to accomodate Nakamura? Use your logic. We need to drop a midfield player and at the end of the day it's down to dropping either Lennon, Keane, Petrov or Maloney. I'd drop Lennon

 

ohh dear.im not that thick. i was just saying that they (telfer, hartson, wilson bobo for that matter, mcmanus) were all also on the field an no goals were goin in. we could always take off hartson and put shaun up with magic. ur intitled 2 ur opinion as i am, lennon is playing well so keep him. i like naka but they r 2 totally different players and i think u need a lennon 2 keep the defense.

 

And here's the end of the story. We have Naka and Lennon - two different players as Lennon's Lass said. Every of them can play when it's needed. That's my opinion and I think there's nothing about to argue...

 

Lennon was superb 2day. Were u at the game?? R u forgeting he is team captain on merit.

Harston was a lazy * and deserved to get hooked. Should have been @ half time. He didn't look interested.

Paul Telfer is by a country mile the weakest link in that team. The whole pace of the game is lost when he is in possesion.

Naka changed the whole complexion of the game when he came on, pace, vision etc. As well as moving Stan into his more natural posiition at centre of mid. His goal was simply stunning.

 

agreed. good pst