Michael Jackson

I see he got off Scott free something dodgy about all of this he has already paid out millions in hush money to previous accusers what does that tell you! I honestly think the guys a serial pervert??

 

Agreed, out of the 10 charges against him all came out Non-Guilty. I feel that seems quite odd, did he not admit plying kids with 'Jesus Juice'?
He's a dodgy character and thats a certainty!

 

Might be dodgy as in 'weird' but he has been found 'not guilty' and that's the bottom line so let's shut up about it!

 

I can't understand how he got off with it. If I said publicly that children slept in my bed and that I gave children alcohol I would have been locked up for life, but once again money talks.

 

Why can't you understand? Do you know exactly what happened?
No one does and just for the sake of the record he's been proven 'not guilty' so stop occupying your mind with it and move on to something else like...Veduka offering large sum of money to come back to Celtic!

 

Its amazin how powerful the media is, they used the prosecutions case to warp the minds of the world into thinking he was a serial molester. Maybe, just maybe, the fella didnt have a childhood and wanted to show his humanitarian side in a way no one else would do. He believed there was no harm in it, i certainly think theres no harm in MJ.

 

He is the last * i want to see back at paradise lazy fat git?

 

Whether he is a paedo or not, he let children into his bed, boys to sleep with them and he admitted this. If any man on here done that - or women - they would be jailed.

 

Exactly it ain't normal behavior is it?

 

It aint normal, but it aint against the law if thats all that happened

 

Are you for real mate it ain't against the law to take children under the age of consent to bed???for * sake get real eh! need to keep my eye on you meethinks??

 

ahaha

if it aint against the law then it should be

because for a grown man to actually WANT to sleep in a bed with young boy's shows that there is something not right and that their is a huge potential for more wrongs to be done. Christ, he had them in his bed, what could possibly be his motive? I shudder to think.

 

Am I the crazy one here? Is it just me or is it WRONG and I mean really wrong for an auld guy to share his bed with young boys?

I can't believe anyone would try and say this is right Maybe Im loosing it..

I feel like a moany * auld wumin

 

Look the fella didnt even hump his missus to have his own children, did it through a tube, poor fella probably cudnt hit a root hes had that much surgery done! He never had a childhood, he wants to be a child and live his youth the way he wasnt able to. What did we all do when we were younger, we had sleepovers with our friends. Chill, i only said is wasnt against the law, he wasnt found guily of any sexual behaviour. And dont slag the man, he's Peter Pan!

 

JACKO MUST BE A HUN cos only one of that type would get away with KIDDY-FIDDLING. should have locked him up and flung the key away but the jury were all members of the orange lodge and thanked jacko very much for his kind donation to the save the roof fund.

 

Thats an interesting take on the matter martibhoy, also full of *!lol

 

not guilty in all 10charges,thats pretty big! im sorry but hes a still a * freak&he slept way wee boys,c'mon who sleeps way children&gets away with it! their not even his kids!!! even the jury people or whoever they are,said he might not be guilty in the case of that gavin boy,but they just didnt have enough evidence to take him down!