1. Having trouble logging in by clicking the link at the top right of the page? Click here to be taken to the log in page.
    Dismiss Notice

Liam Scales

Discussion in 'Celtic Chat' started by Valhalla, Aug 27, 2021.

Discuss Liam Scales in the Celtic Chat area at TalkCeltic.net.

  1. Agathe17

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2025
    Messages:
    300
    Likes Received:
    149
    What has your nationality to do with it? It's Scales nationality that's the issue. If Maik Nawrocki had played like Scales has done, people would be sayin he's a very solid defender because he bought him from Poland and paid £4.5m for him. The fact is Scales has seen off Nawrocki, Lagerbielke and Trusty all on merit. Should we be trying to get a better CB than him to push on in Europe? Certainly. As of now he's the best defender we have here aside from CCV.
     
    Liam Scales likes this.
  2. Mr Shelby Moderator Moderator Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2012
    Messages:
    55,594
    Likes Received:
    44,742
    Location:
    West Lothian
    Fav Celtic Player:
    Larsson. Forever and always.
    Fav Celtic Song:
    Symphony
    I'd have Trusty ahead of him personally. The criticism of him has been way OTT, if we want to talk about extreme flak. Had a rough couple of games against physical opposition but largely performed well and has looked at his best vs pacey attackers and in Europe.

    Scales is a solid squad player and can be a dogged defender. But I think over the course of a run of games, Trusty would compliment CCV with his covering pace.
     
  3. Agathe17

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2025
    Messages:
    300
    Likes Received:
    149
    I don't disagree on Scales being a squad player but I don't think Trusty has had the consistency to oust Scales. Domestically anyway Scales looks more suited to the physical side of the game and I think one reason Rodgers has him in the side ahead of Trusty is Scales is our most progressive defender on the ball. As he has played quite a lot of his football at left back he is much more accustomed to carrying the ball up the pitch and is more comfortable taking on the ball in advanced areas.

    Trusty had a very unimpressive first year for me. He did have two excellent games v Bayern though. He did well over preseason but unfortunately for him so did Scales who has the jersey now and has started the season off well. Think Simpson Pusey will have a hard time forcing himself into the team over the coming season.
     
    Liam Scales likes this.
  4. Mr Shelby Moderator Moderator Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2012
    Messages:
    55,594
    Likes Received:
    44,742
    Location:
    West Lothian
    Fav Celtic Player:
    Larsson. Forever and always.
    Fav Celtic Song:
    Symphony
    Time will tell.

    If JSP is as highly rated as we are being told and really has a future in England then it'd be highly unlikely he won't have enough to nail down a starting spot.
     
  5. Agathe17

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2025
    Messages:
    300
    Likes Received:
    149
    JSP is a complete novice though, he's a similar enough level to Osmand is he not? I'd say the expectation is he might get 15-20 games this season. He has CCV, Scales and Trusty ahead of him now. I don't see him featuring until after the international break.
     
  6. Mr Shelby Moderator Moderator Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2012
    Messages:
    55,594
    Likes Received:
    44,742
    Location:
    West Lothian
    Fav Celtic Player:
    Larsson. Forever and always.
    Fav Celtic Song:
    Symphony
    He is but he won't have been sent here to sit in the stands or on the bench. Just like Denayer, Roberts etc before him.
     
    Liam Scales and Random Review like this.
  7. MacEwan MV3 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2008
    Messages:
    8,553
    Likes Received:
    8,866
    Location:
    Scotland
    Credit for what? The bare minimum?

    No… obviously not. You’ve used an absolute basic moment in a game to try and back up your argument, when it actually hurts you.

    You’re so focused on stats, lets look at a bigger picture. The whole of last season.

    Scales:
    Tackles per 90 - 1.28
    Interceptions per 90 - 0.76

    CCV:
    Tackles per 90 - 1.07
    Interceptions per 90 - 1.22

    Trusty:
    Tackles per 90 - 1.64
    Interceptions per 90 - 1.08

    What that tells you pretty simply is that CCV makes less tackles because he reads the game so well. He interceps the ball more, so tackles aren’t even needed.

    It also tells you Trusty is more efficient than Scales defensively. But we knew that using our eyes.

    Scales isn’t really standing out in either. His strength comes from his effort. You know he’s putting his body in the line or attempting to make a last ditch challenge. But we want to be in positions where we don’t need to make these last ditch challenges. Statistically, since it’s so important to you… Scales is 3rd best. It’s just a fact.

    Passing;

    Scales:
    Passes - 117.14
    Completion - 92.47%

    CCV:
    Passes - 111.25
    Completion - 94.4%

    Trusty:
    Passes - 112.25
    Completion - 93.89%

    The passing stats show that he’s the least efficient. But yes he takes more risks. All these things have to be considered. He had more passes, but remember these are mostly sideways or backwards passes.

    The stats are just for you btw. Not to back up my argument. An argument that you claimed is hate for Scales, which you’re wrong about. You actually claimed that with zero posts slating the guy, apart from saying we are * if he’s our back up left back.

    The biggest factor that has to be considered is look at the stats and then look at the situations where he’s losing the ball. These moments stand out. That intercepted pass against Aberdeen that had them through on goal is a prime example. He does the simple pretty well, but once that simple ball isn’t on… mistakes creep in.

    Bottom line, we can do a lot better. Trusty is better and people have the same hate for him that you say people have for Scales. Trusty must be Irish too.
     
    Mr Shelby likes this.
  8. Guchi Gucci Gold Member Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2010
    Messages:
    1,535
    Likes Received:
    1,423
    I prefer Trusty too but drawing conclusions on such high level stats doesn't really work.
     
  9. MacEwan MV3 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2008
    Messages:
    8,553
    Likes Received:
    8,866
    Location:
    Scotland
    If you read my post, thats pretty much exactly what I’m saying.

    Your man brought up Scales’ match stats from the weekend to try and paint a false narrative. The stats were for him.

    Stats are one small part of a much bigger picture.
     
  10. Agathe17

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2025
    Messages:
    300
    Likes Received:
    149
    Ok, let's focus on stats so. From WhoScored using SPL games last season, 1st being our best performer in these statistics, some will have the highest score as the best and some will have the lowest score as the best.

    Dribbled past per 90:
    1. CCV 0.1
    2. Scales 0.2
    3. Trusty 0.5

    Interceptions per 90:
    1. CCV 1.2
    2. Scales 1
    3. Trusty 0.7

    Clearances per 90:
    1. Scales 5.7
    2. CCV 5.4
    3. Trusty 4.2

    Shots blocked per 90:
    1. Trusty 0.9
    2. Scales 0.4
    3. CCV 0.3

    Tackles per 90
    1. Trusty 1.6
    2. Scales 1.2
    3. CCV 1


    Crosses blocked per 90:

    1 = Trusty & Scales 0.3
    3. CCV 0.0

    Passes blocked per 90
    1 = Trusty & Scales 0.4
    3. CCV 0.2

    Aerial duels per 90
    1. Scales 8.6
    2. Trusty 7.2
    3. CCV 5.9

    Aerial duels won per 90
    1. Scales 6.3 (73%)
    2. Trusty 4.6 (63%)
    3. CCV 4.3 (73%)

    Unsuccessful touches per 90

    1. CCV 0.4
    2. Scales 0.5
    3. Trusty 0.8

    Dispossessed per 90
    1. Scales 0
    2. CCV 0.1
    3. Trusty 0.2

    Accurate long balls per 90
    1. Trusty 2.9
    2. Scales 2.8
    3. CCV 2.1

    Inaccurate long balls per 90
    1. Trusty 1.5
    2. CCV 1.8
    3. Scales 2.3

    Accurate short passes per 90
    1. Scales 103.9
    2. Trusty 102.6
    3. CCV 101

    Inaccurate short passes per 90
    1. CCV 3.7
    2. Trusty 5.4
    3. Scales 6.6

    Key passes per 90
    1. Scales 0.4
    2= Trusty & CCV 0.2

    Throughballs per 90
    1. Scales 0.1
    2= Trusty & CCV 0

    Assists per 90
    1. Scales 0.1
    2= Trusty & CCV 0

    Fouled per 90:
    1= Scales & Trusty 0.7
    3. CCV 0.5

    Fouls per 90

    1. Trusty 0.6
    2= CCV & Scales 0.8

    Successful dribbles per 90
    1. Scales 0.3
    2. Trusty & CCV 0.1

    Unsuccessful dribbles per 90
    1. CCV 0
    2. Scales 0.1
    2. Trusty 0.2

    Goals per 90

    1. Scales 0.1
    2= Trusty & CCV 0

    Avg Rating
    1. Scales 7.48
    2. CCV 7.31
    3. Trusty 7.28

    Statistically speaking Scales was our best performing defender in the SPL last season. While he might have given the ball away more (marginally), he was also our best performing defender in terms of goals, assists, long passes attempted, key passes, successful dribbles and through balls. This all points to Scales being the most progressive defender we have on the ball, all these stats point to someone who is proactive on the ball and doesn't just play the short and safe conservative passes. He looks to advance the play much more than either CCV or Trusty and this is probably part of the decision in why Rodgers plays him over Trusty

    Aerially Scales is also our best defender with the most aerial duels competed and won, in % terms also. And he did not rank last in any of the pure defensive metrics.
     
    Liam Scales likes this.
  11. Agathe17

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2025
    Messages:
    300
    Likes Received:
    149
    A false narrative? That's a mad thing to say

    Statistics are not perfect or defenitive but one thing they are is an objective and independent metric. Your opinions are highly subjective and seem to be ones dealing in a false narrative of reality.
     
  12. MacEwan MV3 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2008
    Messages:
    8,553
    Likes Received:
    8,866
    Location:
    Scotland
    Yes that’s it.

    Disregard the Champions League and the games we are really tested to twist stats in your own favour :rofl:

    You’ve entirely missed my point, or even added to it. Stats don’t tell the whole story. I wasn’t posting stats to discredit Scales and prove you wrong, I posted them to show you that there’s a much bigger picture.

    I think you’re struggling to understand that.

    Football stats are not completely objective and independent.

    A miss placed pass could be an 8 yard pass straight to the defenders feet or a 40 yard diagonal. On the stats sheet it just goes down as a number, but when we use our eyes and critical thinking we can understand the stats a lot better. They can not be used alone as a measuring stick, which you’ve tried to do to discredit what people have seen with their eyes.

    We’ve gone full circle now, hopefully you understand.