'Honest' mistakes 24/25

They've said that the on-field decision was correct, which was no penalty.

 

The fact that the Kyogo penalty incident vs Livingston from last month wasn’t flagged as a mistake takes all credibility away from this list.

 

The list is a clear attempt to deflect from the real stats on game changing calls and penalties for one team in the league.

 

One of the other decisions that they said VAR got wrong was the penalty awarded to Kilmarnock against Rangers.

Lundstrum turned his back and swung his arm well outside his body line.

The ref gave the decision, but the panel say VAR should have intervened to overturn the decision. Considering VAR is only supposed to get involved with clear and obvious errors that is another strange opinion.

As mentioned above the Kyogo penalty at Livi should have been down as a mistake. It was a stonewall penalty.

So should Rangers penalty against us when Johnston got the ball. That should never have went to VAR review. Also not showing the ref the point where Johnston made contact with the ball is a huge VAR mistake.

What is the point of the review panel when they fail to address clear and obvious errors, but at the same time criticise VAR when it did the correct thing and not get involved in a a decision that was not a clear and obvious error?

 

It's deflection because the stats are showing who exactly they have been favouring or in real world words, cheating for. Fire a we review out. Have rangers the hard done by ones. Skew stats however they wish. News is off them for the world record penalties in a season all while having a world record of not conceding any while handballing the ball 10 times+

 

VAR Scotland, run by huns for huns, that’s all the analysis required.

 

Anyone any thoughts today? I'm thinking of the incident where Forrest got a boot in his face. Is it totally different from the Yang one at Tynecastle? I'm hesitant to state categorically that it's the same, as there might be a relevant difference I have missed; but my first impression is that it's basically the same thing.

 

Another game where a team gets very physical with us, yet bizarrely ends up conceding only 7 fouls. We gave away almost double that with 13 fouls.

There is something seriously wrong that we dominate games, get fouled so regularly, yet the stats keep showing something completely different.

Also, how did he miss the handball?

The only person that didn't see it was Clancy. Shankland stopped dead in his tracks as he knew how obvious it was.

 

One of the worst was close to the end, we took a quick throw to Forrest running in behind and Kingsley I think just grabbed him by the arm and held him to stop him getting away and he ignored or never seen in, then Hearts booted it up the park and ended up with a corner that one Johnston headed it out.

 

Not seen it, but during the Yang thing, even our own fans, folk kept telling us any high foot to be head was a straight red.

I've seen ones since then, which go unchallenged though and seemingly now again.

Go figure.

Sent from my M2012K11AG using Tapatalk

 

Cantwell too against st mirren

Sent from my 21121210G using Tapatalk

 

Interested to know the difference between the two.

 

Would like to see that Shankland elbow(?) again. Very intentional.

 

Surprised that Shankland never received a 2nd yellow for the handball as he already had another foul where he possibly could have seen a 2nd yellow for that

 

Same, wasn't really replayed on sportscene and also they never even showed the high boot incident.

 

They never show that type of * when it involves us,

Sent from my 21121210G using Tapatalk

 

What a number 6 he is for the opposition..

Lanky streak a pish..