'Honest' mistakes 24/25

Tbh Dermot Gallagher has a trend of saying these dodgy decisions for the Huns are always correct.

No sure about him at all tbh

 

He’s one of us it’s just he prefer to be paid handsomely for the job he’s doing same with that chick McFadden sucks up Boyd’s * something awful it boak inducing


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

As I've said before, just look at all the impartial football forums including the English clubs. They managed to see that decision for what it was. Even all the Scottish supporter forums are the same.

That many people can't be wrong.

Ref watch didn't see that Johnston got the ball and badly contradicted themselves with another review on the same show.

And remember this was a VAR decision that have to be clear and obvious errors.

 

So in the instance where he wins the ball as he’s falling back where’s his leg meant to go? He didn’t go in high he won the ball and his leg followed through as he was falling so what was he meant to do with his leg after he won the ball?

 

I genuinely cannot believe there’s people in our support actually defending the decision. There’s huns who don’t even think it was a penalty.

 

Seems we have asked the question re the short VAR clip which didn’t show AJ winning the ball. Very suspicious.

 

Absolutely * all will be done, but we need to pressure them. Guys like Walsh and Beaton need binned from our game.

 

That needs to be answered..when beaton 1st went over all it showed at least 5 times was his contact on that diving *. That plants the doubt in his head...show the full movement from the very beginning it could have and should have stayed with his original decision.

 

He is a weapon and should be taken off that Ref watch thing. He said on that today definite freekick at their disallowed goal, how has ge missed that and now I am reading somewhere he’s talking about play having moved on and time to reset.

 

Celtic have written to the SFA for clarification over the Rangers Fabio Silva penalty flashpoint – as they are convinced ref John Beaton wasn’t given the full picture.

Hoops chiefs have concerns over the VAR footage sent to the whistler to consider after his initial decision to yellow card the Gers attacker for diving in Sunday’s Ibrox thriller. Celts believe the clip Beaton was shown on the sidelines did not include the moment Alistair Johnston touched the ball before Silva collided with his outstretched leg


The VAR footage was shown by broadcasters Sky Sports but the slowed down section did not include the initial tackle. Under IFAB rules, a challenge can still be a penalty if the defending player gets the ball first and the officials deem the tackle to be careless, reckless or has excess force.



But the Hoops are adamant Johnston’s attempt to intercept didn’t meet any of those thresholds and are looking for clarity at how the decision was reached. A Celtic spokesperson said: “The club has been in correspondence with the Scottish FA regarding the VAR process throughout the season, and has also played an active part in the SPFL working group which is seeking to work with the Scottish FA to improve standards for all clubs. We have raised our further concerns regarding the VAR process in the match with the Scottish FA and await a response.


Celtic boss Brendan Rodgers insisted on Sunday the spot kick was the wrong decision – and proved to be pivotal in the clash as Gers were handed a lifeline at 2-0 down before the sides eventually battled out a 3-3 draw.

Rodgers said: “Ali, who was on a booking, has to be really careful in the second half with the timing of his tackles and I thought he was perfect with it. I thought the referee got it absolutely right on the field. He connected with the ball, the player simulates and it was right.

 

Celtic have called out why the full extent of clip was not shown on var to allow Beaton to make the best decision


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

See fundamentally on their penalty does the contact from Johnston on Silva prevent Silva from getting on the ball or put him at any disadvantage or is it the fact there is a nick on the ball? To me it’s the later, see as soon as he takes another step and puts both feet together and goes down it’s a dive.

Just because Johnston’s foot after touching the ball whilst falling tickles Silva’s knee does not make it a penalty.

We were told last week Kyogo’s wasn’t because it’s a contact sport there was far more contact and that contact actually caused Kyogo to fall.

Beaton is taking a lot of flack for that but to me Walsh should never be referring him to have a look there he called it spot on.

I did think Beaton was at it with the cheap fouls and cards early on often giving in to the crowd or their nonsense but the penalty to them is on Walsh.

 

I've seen Roger Hannah referring to the Jesus Arsenal penalty the day before. That was as clear a trip on the legs as you'll ever see. A wee touch of the ball and brings both his legs down after as Jesus is away..

Johnston gets a wee touch of the ball and just touches ever so slightly that greeting faced * and the you've nailed the most pertinent part of his role. He takes another step and then throws his self to the ground..

 

Glad we've raised the issue as to why the contact with the ball first wasn't used. We all know the answer but SFA will make some bullshit up as usual.

 

The huns and the referees are complete cheats.

 

Not sure if people are just trying to look non biased so they’re going against the grain no matter how dumb it is or whether they’ve just not that much football knowledge.

 

I think there is an underlying issue of it absolving Rodgers of blame, which it does, so folk don’t want to concede that and are doubling down and then looking to find the negatives with Rodgers in the second half. When in reality, the game completely changed when that ridiculous penalty was awarded. It would have changed any game similar throughout the world in the same circumstances as well.

 

True mate some fans are desperate for rodgers to fail which I think is disgraceful since that means Celtic also fails

 

Well head VAR ref is at it then as what he showed he trying to influence the situation.

 

He is meant to defy physics mate. As some would have you believe.