Scott Allan

Scott Allan should play more simple

 

If rogic not fit then he must start...having either of the playing makes huge difference to the way we play going forward.

 

Surely the rumour he is off is not true


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Started by a fake account on twitter

 

Well you started it so let us know.

 

not true

 

Those * fake reporter accounts


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

don't listen to Twitter nothing but *

 

Alarm bells have got to be going off for Scott now. Couldn't even get in the team against EK ahead of a guy that's been out for months. Game was crying out for a bit of imagination to split them open as well. Would have seemed obvious to start Allan & bring Mulgrew on after 60mins for Brown who was just coming back from injury. Doesn't look promising.

 

Well unless Ronny performs some sort of miracle it looks like he'll be replaced before the end of the season. I expect Allan to have a better chance when the new guy assesses the players.

I notice he made a couple of mistakes today but they were only noticeable because so many of his passes come off. You can see him searching and probing with energy wanting players to use the space behind the defence. Once our forwards have that understanding with him then we'll make very good runs in the box.

Maybe that's why he isn't getting played, he's on a different wavelength than our midfielders like Forrest and GMS. GMS has potential I think, Forrest is past it for me. I've always liked him but he doesn't seem as eager as he should be.

Commons, Rogic, Christie, McGregor and Griffiths do understand Allan. Roberts will probably be his soul mate.

 

As I said in the beginning. Waste of money as he would never play. This is the type of game he should of been on for. He tore the championship up, yet he's not good enough in ronnys eyes to tear up a non league side. Something smells fishy

 

* is going on here. He's need to be giving a proper run. He's showed more desire in the 10 mins he played against Ajax than the rest of the team. (Not literally)

 

Why did we sign him? When people where saying it was to * the zombies off I thought nah but it looks like it cause he can't get any * game time and he has never had a fair chance at the club.

 

He tries to hard when he plays, he needs to settle down abit and make better use of the ball. He is an exciting looking player but not everything has to be a wonder pass or reverse ball. Sometimes the simple pass is the better pass, keep possession.

 

When you get 20 mins every few weeks can you blame him for trying to make an impact. Guy needs a run of 10 games & we would reap the benefits but Armstrong will be first pick again next week & Mulgrew has came straight back in and is ahead of him already, add Roberts & Christie to the fold as well & they guy has no chance.

 

I said at the time we shoudnt have signed him. Not good enough and only signed him to annoy the Huns.

 

He'll get his chance, to be honest would of started him behind Griffiths yesterday instead of Kazim, we were missing someone to find that pocket of space behind the striker yesterday.

 

442 but

 

The biggest think I've learned with Celtic atm is, see when you think something should be happening it generally doesn't.