Syrian Rebel EATS heart

What do you have issue with?

They are biased,if you can't see that you're the one who is 'moronic'.Libya/Syria they are 'freedom fighters' and 'rebels' but if they are fighting against Israeli/US or British interests then they're called 'terrorists' as in Iraq Afghanistan and Palestine.

 

In Libya and Syria they are fighting other Libyans and Syrians. They are openly warring against their respective regimes for whatever reasons. AKA Rebels, Insurgents.

When you start attacking other countries you become a Terrorist.

Prime example is the IRA, rebelling in NI, became terrorists when they started planting bombs and murdering children instead of attacking military personnel/installations.

 

All due respect guys but this post is about Syria not the Balkans so...

 

I think you should seek the definition of 'terrorist' and 'terrorism',you're way off.I also think you should save the 'moronic' comments with the ignorance displayed in that last post

 

well most of the news was very black and white rteporting.

I know what you mean. Mirko Jovicevic was the journalist with the then yugo army, who said that Seselj's chetniks (an individual unit) looted and plundered (this is correct) and 'played football with a severed head' (whether this 'football' actually occurred remains to be seen, I haven't seen any evidence that says it did).

seselj didn't care one bit for his own people. criminal, war profiteer and lunatic. not a REAL soldier. disgraced the flag, crest and the Chetnik movement.

sorry mods I know this is off topic.

 

No, you will not find it on Google, because it doesn't exist. I see your last post was a rude misrepresentation. I just let you to see how far you will go. The things you are taking are totally different.

The famous war photographies of the Mujahideen playing football with severed Serbian heads in Bosnia and Herzegovina were taken by the members of the brigade "El Mujahid", which included the leaders of the gang from the French Roubaix, who were converted to Islam in 90ties.
Olivier Pighetti's documentary, shown in France on "France 3 channel," says a gang of Ruobaix was active during the 90s around Lille and "no one will forget it."
Based on these facts, Pighetti's talking about gangs, their atrocities , particularly those committed during the war. At the beginning of the 90s the two Frenchmen joined the Mujahideen Brigade in Bosnia. Olivier Pighetti, during the research, comes to the Serbian and Croatian soldiers who had unreleased videos of mujaheddin camps in Bosnia. "Serbs and Croats have tried to show this footage, as well as crimes of this brigade, to find out what all is going on," explained he to the French newspaper "Liberation".
Mujahedeen who posed with the head of Serbian soldier Blagoje Blagojević on Crni Vrh in the summer in 1992 is a French citizen Christophe Caze, who, it has been long believed , was killed in clashes with the Belgian police. Some people claim he is still in Bosnia.
People who speak French can see this documentary on you tube.
Le Gang de Roubaix.
Also, in Norwegian documentaries, "Sarajevo ricochet" and "Srebrenica, a town betrayed", people can see that mujaheedins cut Serbian heads, posed with them.
Norwegian and French documentaries aren't Serbian point of view.
But, of course, all people who made this documentaries had many treats and all those facts were pushed under the carpet, because someone doesn't want it to be seen.

Absolutely true. Remember Tanović's Oscar awarded movie? he showed videos of Serbian victims from Kukavice and represent them as Muslims.
Also, remember how they lied about The Račak incident?
In Germany, there was also documentary made by the Germans which shows how NATO lied about Račak. I think some German officer said he couldn't lie about it any more and he admitted the truth. All Germany was shocked, but after few week, this was pushed under the carpet too.
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eU48zVL23QE&feature=player_embedded"]Kosovo documentary - It began with a lie (1/5) - YouTube[/ame]
I expect similar scenario in Syria.

I agree, but he said lies and he didn't post any proofs. I post video that shows who really did it. Nasser would be probably the happiest if the Wahhabies makes Serbs and Croats in Bosnia and Herzegovina to pay some kind of religious taxes for non-Muslims, like some of them request.

Me neither.

 

According to the British the North is part of their country... There is such a thing as domestic terrorists.

You're using the word terrorist just like Brits are :smiley-laughing002:

The 'rebels' in Syria are now having to go up against Hezbollah. I have no time for Assad but have even less for these 'rebels'. Hezbollah Hezbollah Hezbollah.

 

Another point are a lot of these so called 'rebels' not from other countries as well?
I also see the media yesterday were peddling the 'chemical attack' by the Army.

And today Russia sends some nice shiny weapons to Syria - just incase the US sends one of it's carriers close by i imagine :smiley-laughing002:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-22565405

Yes i know it's BBC, but they wouldn't lie about this :smiley-laughing002:

 

What exactly has Assad done wrong? Any Government would fight back against this and the west basically set the free army up figuring with the lack of oil and heroin in Syria it would be bad for PR to invade a land they themselves want control over. I hate Hezbollah 100% but this has got out of control and with Russia backing up Assad it's time to cut any funding to rebel forces. People are not collateral damage.

 

I think pretty much the same.
It is an interesting fact that people like Assad and Gaddafi ruled for 40/30 years and the west didn't care about it, but when they are treat to the West's aims, let's learn people in their country what democracy is.
I'm not entirely clear who is fighting who in Syria. One side- the rebels or "those oppressed people", on the other side of the regular army As far as I know in Syria military service is compulsory ( at least it used to be). If so, it follows that the regular army are the ordinary people. Now if it is not popular regime, and the rebellion of the people is already there, I wonder how that insurgency has not become the revolution? And all of this brings me to thinking that the rebels' side has a weapon delivery, so why shouldn't the Russians do the same thing?

 

Apparently Gaddafi wanted the muslim world to change their currency to gold thus turning the financial "power" of the west on its head and that's why he was overthrown. Saddle Hussein was the first to try it and look at what happened to him and his country. Our governments are insane.

 

Can't there is no arguing against morons like you.

 

All the different types of Rebellion, in all cases they are Rebels.

Insurrection - an armed but limited rebellion.
Insurgency - Rebels who aren't recognised by the Govt they fight.
Revolution - Rebels (or radicals) who attempt to overthrow the established Govt.
Mutiny - Rebellion on soldiers against their commanders.
Revolt - Localised rebellion.
Subversion - Hidden rebellion, non-overt.
Resistance - Rebels who fight against particular forms of discrimination and/or repression.Can be peaceful (Gandhi) or violent (IRA)

Of course any sane person will tell you, a rebel is not necessarily a terrorist and vice versa. Terrorists use terror to deliberately scare,control and coerce people (in particular civilians) in order to achieve their goals.

It could be state terrorism;
Political - Irish Coercion Act 1881.
Violent - Multiple putdowns of protests in countries across the world (Egypt,South Africa, Burma, Bahrain)

Then you get group terrorism which is almost exclusively violent.

9/11,Warrington bombings,rackets, brownshirts and Gestapo attempts to kill/control civilians and not Soldiers/Security forces etc.

Now why would anyone in the West classify the Syrian Rebels as terrorists??
At the moment every atrocity is claimed (to have been done by) one side or the other but because ASSAD bans UN investigators (and journalists), and peace talks have failed, we cannot possibly know who has done what and why.

 

That might be the stupidest post I have ever read on here.

 

Yes it's completely unhinged

 

You need to re read your original post.

 

Dirty *

 

The war is being fought between the government of Assad who are alawite muslims and are a minority in the country against the sunni rebels. The sunni's are the largest ethnic group in the country and as such think that they should be allowed to run it. Your point about Assad and Gaddafi seems to be a little misguided because at least in the case of Gaddafi he had been known to be anti us for almost the entire timehe was ruling libya. Both of these revolutions or rebellions whatever you choose to call them are happening because of demonstrations that began during the arab spring. When protesters took to the streets to peacefully demand that Assad step down they were fired upon by assad's military and because of this the rebellion started. The rebel forces are made up of the Free Syrian Army, which is a large part of Assad's army that has defected to the rebels side along with militia's. The mujahadeen who are radical foreign fighters intent on installing an islamic government once assad has been overthrown are also fighting on the rebels side but their is alot of distrust between them and the other rebels who favor a more secular government. Other arab countries are supplying the rebels with weaponry and the U.S. has been supplying them with vehicles and gosoline. The assad government is backed by Iran who do not want to lose one of their only shia allies in the region and are giving the syrians weapons aswell as ordering hezbollah into the fighting. Russia is also supplying the government with weapons.

 

You just proved that you don't even understand what terrorism actually is,if all you have in response is insults then that say's it all.