Ki Sung-Yueng

Tainted view as in our original views and opinions on a particular player/s. I do not mean tainted as in "bad" terms but tainted as in a view that is "pre-empted" in a way.

 

I am still not making sense of it.

 

.... put it this way. You see a hun and you also see a tim.Before you get to know them which one will you be more favourable towards? Still not getting it?

 

Our already existing feelings on a player. Pre-emptive/pre-meditated/pre-conceived/whatever.

 

Aye,ok.

But if i see a Tim and a Hun,i will have a bit of a clue who i will like.

I can not see how i or any other Celtic man would have a Pre-emptive/Tainted view of Ki.

 

Not making sense.

 

Read my post again.

People's preference and taste towards a particular player and/or their style of play and obviously people's discontent and non-approval of a player and/or their style of play will lead to the highlighted conclusion, except that it applies to other players as well (as ive already stated).

 

How?

 

I apologise for te last post i made to Celtic Magic....i confused a previous post.

 

Hahaha, why does that matter? ive alreadly read your posted quoting my post and someone elses. I've pressed the quote button and had no intention of excluding the quotes, which by no means deserve to be called clever . I think my post and the other chaps relate quite well in fact, we both emphasize the importance of pre-emption in a one's view of a person.

So, how about you relate back to my original post beacause im getting quite derailed from the point i wanted to make originally

 

Ehm,i am totally confused here.



I can't see how we have tainted views.

Surely a view is a view ? no.

Every player is entitled to thier plaudits and critics.

 

Totally agree and i have apologised a couple of posts above.

I mis-read your post and thought you had just picked a few words up to quote.

Apologies.

Bed time for me.

 

Seriously, refer back to my previous posts plzzzzz. I did not want to say player should be safe from critics. What i wanted to say, players (Ki is an example) do not deserve to be judged or commented upon the tainted views (i.e. pre-empted views). For example Ki has an okay game versus Whoever United but is criticized by some for being * just because they never really rated the player.

However, as i've said, this is excluding the constructive critics but including those who consistently jump on a player for being "*" and "should be sold".

Another point i want to make is that this does indeed work both ways, and sometimes people are over generous towards some players for the same reasons as i've stated above.

 

We are all entitled to make mistakes mate. No harm or offence taken

 

he can start plays from the back, but he works better when he moves up and plays off the strikers and wingers

 

* player that is all

 

Not been the same since his illness

 

He was excellent tonight.

 

Ki can pass a good ball, but his marking is absolutely shockin, likes to just sit and watch the ball

 

Pathetic post about one of your players! He was decent tonight against one of the best midfields in Italy and playing out of position.

Whole team played well for me, apart from Cha maybe.