WAS WGS CORRECT TO LEAVE OUT AIDEN?

I was talking about Naka. Sorry , I should've made it clearer.

 

maloney is not in the same class as mcgeady .even if they were of equal ability which they most certainly are not you would always go with the phisically stronger and bigger player maloney is a sqaud player nothing else he is to small and easily knocked of the ball .wednesday was a performance lacking in any real class the team with every new signing becomes more average .lawell must also take his share of blame here as he is holding the purse strings.i fear a long dark winter unless drastic action is taken

 

watched it on tv and it seemed a great atmosphere , usually is when they play at home esp. against munster, have sold over 8000 season tickets so that says it all....

 

Agreed, i've always said from day one he needs to be played in the centre.

 

Over 10,000 sold now. We've had attendances of 13,000+ and 15,000+ so far this season.

The Munster match next weekend is going to be mega. Going for our fourth win in five over the cousin *.

 

Yes, Aiden has been poor since he signed his new contract.

However he will come back stronger IMO

Unfortunately he still persists with McManus, one of our poorest centre backs in many years

 

think he has a point wgs plays his boys the ones he likes even if they a playing * mic caldwell naka big jan and brown. so why shouldn't he keep playing even if he has had a couple of games he hasn't proformed well in. should be giving a chance to turn it around like the rest

 

You actually have got one thing right for a change.Naka is definitely no Maradona!!!I'm glad your touching love for Naka hasnt blinded you to that inescapable fact.In fact reading the rest of your hilarious post you are once again right(this is turning into a good night for you)I quote you once again on your idol Naka"Yes,he's a lightweight,and a bit slow"Hardly a ringing endorsement of a player you describe as"way too important to drop"
I'll repeat this once again for you because you seem incapable of understanding English.No Celtic player is above being dropped and that includes McGeady,Boruc,McManus and of course your beloved Nakamura.Your description of Naka"getting us to the last 16 of the CL"neglects to mention that Artur saved a penalty in the same game,wasnt that as important?Also leagues are won over a number of games,one free kick did not win the league.

And finally if you stop using stupid examples,Torres,Maradona to illustrate your idiotic points I'll keep quiet.I sincerely hope for your sake Naka doesnt go in January or else you'll be on suicide watch.

 

what does nakamura offer ??? he is there for free kicks nothing else he is so weak a high wind would take him out the game and no pace at all

 

lightning fast ? you been watching re runs on fast forward

 

Oh i understand English, But when your grammar and punctuation are THAT bad, its a little hard at times.

oh how i await KK-Bhoy to point out how ironic my post was.

 

Are you not the same man who said 'McGeady is *' ?

 

i was quoted as saying that yes, but i was also quoted as saying, he is a player with huge potential, but doesn't live up to it enough, therefore technically yes, he is *, with glimpses of magic.

i think he has the potential to be absolutely brilliant, but too much of his game is lacking for it to happen imo, his form definitely has been * though, no denying that.

 

Are you being serious?

I notice you havent answered any of the points in my post.

 

*, with glimpses of magic ?

 

to tell you the truth mate, i couldn't be * reading it.

maybe if you had put spaces etc, and made it easier for me to read, then perhaps i would have read it, or maybe the fact your too argumentative put me off it, i don't know, don't care.

EDIT: read one part of it now, i also praised Boruc too, very highly, not just Naka, when KK-Bhoy got his wee snide comment in about my love for Boruc and Naka, i gave you my reasons for my apparent man love.

i don't think Naka is undroppable, but i do think he shouldn't be dropped, especially when their is far worse players getting a game in more vital positions, so sorry if i said he is undroppable, i made a mistake, i think he shouldn't be dropped, not can't be dropped.

 

Yes.

most games he is *, but he always shows a bit of magic now and again, which is why people clearly know he has potential, and people clearly no he isn't playing as well as he could.

 

And you think the above sentence is a good example of English?

 

Not the best, but take at look at your post ffs, and explain how my sentence was a bad example of English, I understood every word, without a struggle, whereas it was extremely confusing to read your post.

There wasn't even spaces in the thing mate, stop being argumentative and grow up.