Liam Scales

Do you just want me to say I don’t agree with his username as well? Because I don’t.
My issue was you, using ‘special bus’ as an insult. Then you’re basically claiming you have a right to say that because someone else has got a name which mocks disabilities which is whataboutery.
The fact you can’t even admit the term you used is wrong shows me everything I need to know about you as a person

 

Hope the mods delete all these because it’s childish at the end of the day. I just can’t stand people who can never admit when they’re in the wrong

 

It's pathetic really the level of abuse that posting an article by an independent journalist summar

No I didn't. You started following me into threads where I posted and just started posting abuse at me without ever engaging in the topic. You are derailing the thread here into this sideshow because you don't like the premise that Scales is winning praise for his performanes. You want him to fail because otherwise you look silly. You're a bit odd.

 

My comment might be in bad taste, I can put my hands up and admit that and I will happily delete but it's worth pointing that you are completely insincere and a complete hypocrite and weren't taking issue with that comment.

Did you ever conisder how this might be mocking to people with disabilities in their families?
It's a fair question and now that you're on your crusade you might take it up or maybe you don't really care?

 

My comment 'might' be in bad taste. hahahahahaha * sake mate.

 

But you're still dodging the issue.

You obviously think its acceptable to mock disabilities with parody characters in a movie. I'm just noting that contradiction.

This kind of characterisation of those with special needs is acceptable to you? Yes or no?

 

The irony

You've rapidly rose through the ranks in record breaking time as the most argumentative and contrary * on here

 

I've already responded with the fact I don't agree with his username? What else do you want here?

 

I'm not angry. I'm not argumentative. I put points forward in a civil manner and its people like you get very angry and upset and resort to abuse and insults as they can't tolerate a view differing from theirs.

It takes 2 people to argue. The difference between me and you is I can tolerate opposing viewpoints, I don't have an ego that makes me think I'm always right. Why do you get so angry and abusive because someone disagreed with you? You can disagree in a civil manner or walk away, you do know that?

 

For clarity, you never responded to the fact you didn't agree with his username. These were your quotes, none of them stated anything prior to the one where you said you already did.

I'm glad at the 6th time of asking you straightened out your contradictions. I have edited my post and apologise as I should not have used that term and it was not meant to insult that term but I understand how it looked.

 

Unbelievable the * you're coming out with

You can tolerate opposing viewpoints is an absolute belter. The same guy who resorts to the toys out the pram you don't know football waffle as if you're some kinda Pep student. Lol. You 100% always think you're right, hence you're endless essays and arguing for arguments sake..

Drop me out. You're fooling no one with your victim pish

 

Once again. You are misrepresenting. Of course I can tolerate opposing viewpoints which is why I've had many compeltely civil and robust debates without any form of abuse being entered into here with many posters. I have an issue when I have to deal with people like you, who come on and hurl abuse and insults at posters because you don't agree with their views. You are a very angry man who can't tolerate opposing viewpoints.

I've been stalked around this forum and had abuse hurled at me on a regular basis by MacEwan. A lot of people were triggered because a BBC journalist thinks that there is a case for Scales currently being our best defender. They have got extremely exercised over it.

I don't claim to be right, I have views, I can substantiate why I feel that way. I could awalys be wrong, I'm fully conscious of that but its people like you who ruin this forum when we can't have a civil discussion or debate without insults and abuse flying out the gate. It ruins and derails threads far too much.

 

whats this then?

Do you just want me to say I don’t agree with his username as well? Because I don’t.

 

Apologies. I must have skipped over that line.

That's fair enough for me. Case closed.

 

Jesus

 

That's your ego denying everything again there. You could just acknowledge it. No doubt you'll be reverting to type and jumping two footed into threads calling people fannies becuase you don't agree with them.

 

Any how think Scales has been our best player so far, starting to have doubt CCV carrying the ball out or even playing a ball over the top creates very little think we should be thinking of buying a ball carrying defender come January

 

CCV is overrated and Scales is underrated. That much is true.

CCV at his best is our best 'defender' but hasn't been at his best for a very long time and is poor on the ball.

Scales is also poor on the ball but better than CCV and plays riskier passes.

We need better than both moving forward.

End of story.

 

So whats the craic with Scales then? Im confused in here.

 

Sticks and Stones mate.

Have a good one.