Kelechi Iheanacho

If this is true and it is a loan then it basically confirms we never had any plan in place for Kyogo going despite seemingly knowing it was on the cards for a while he would be off

 

I think its pretty clear Kvistgaarden was our plan and we've been unable to do a deal there. So this is a backup plan.

 

Had a 19 goal season 4/5 years ago and hasn't cracked double figures since, doesn't fill me with confidence, hopefully just a lazy link because he's an ex Rodgers player.

 

Never actually watched him play tbh but was he not very highly rated? Could be confusing him with Abraham though

 

Someone who I think showed so much promise in his early days with Man City but I would say made a bad move to Leicester as they treat Vardy as their Kane because given half the chance Vardy is always playing regardless of form.

Would be real intrigued to see how this type of move would work out and wouldn't be against him coming in short term whilst also getting in kvistgaarden and allowing him time to settle into Glasgow life whilst Iheanacho and Idah are our main 2

 

Like the idea tbh. He’s a player when he on it and sometimes a player just needs a certain club.

I’m for Kvistgaarden but don’t want to pay crazy money. If we end up going over £10m for him and he doesn’t get going we have £20m worth of strikers up top of may not be good enough. (All for Idah btw but jury still clearly out which is fair)


I think folk seem to believe we have an endless pot of money. We could be in for a few years without CL now so have to get to keep this player trading model going as it is.

 

Or had a plan we were unable to execute, which is worse..

But, like I keep saying a lot can happen in the next two days.

 

Sevilla have good pedigree at taking these players in the middle of their career and turning them into top end la Liga/ Europa league players. Considering his previous history with Rodgers, the structure of the deal, age, strengths etc I wouldn't be too unhappy with this. Yes kvistgaarden is the much much more exciting but maybe too risky with the fee involved

Sent from my Pixel 8 Pro using Tapatalk

 

There's very little similarly in profile between this and Kvistgaarden to suggest it was our direct backup plan.

We've went way down the list clearly.. unless our targeting devolves to player we've been watching for 18 months and Rodgers phone book.

 

Ridiculous but not unsurprising.

 

Honestly don’t know what to make of this.

On the one hand I’m thinking it might be a fresh start and he has had potential but not happened for him.

The other is this is a panic deal and he’s going to flop massively.

 

KDS guy said we wouldn't like a striker being named.
Is it this chap?