'Honest' mistakes 24/25

Ex ref Maddhun saying Kyogo's challenge on Doohan was wreckless and was lucky action wasn't taken.

Er challenge... what * challenge.

Kyogo was fully entitled to go for that ball. Was a pure 50-50 with both players going for the ball. No intent to endangerment keeper at all.

 

It's just one of those unfortunate things that happens at times. Both had eyes on the ball with no intent.

 

And Shinnie... I said it at the start of the match on here, see how many fouls Shinnie commits, within two minutes he commits a foul by pulling a jersey when he's beaten, it's a yellow all day long, no booking.. how he and Nilsen( two absolute hammer throwers) stayed on the pitch is anyone's guess.. our players got absolutely no protection from the ref. Standard

 

That * today had mutant written all over him..

Letting pull backs go galore, no card. Blowing up instantly for wee 50/50 barges off Forrest. Just an utter hun *..

The usual cards when the game was over and in the last 10..

Another wee incident with the big dopey looking orange * was when Johnston gets shoved in the back at pace, which causes him to fly in to Bernardo who's warming up and gets a sore one. Hibs throw..

Rat..

 

We got away with one yesterday with Scales, let's be honest.
If we didn't get a decision like that, this thread would be in absolute meltdown.

As mentioned many times before, there is no bias, just incompetence.

 

We got away with one, how many did they get away with?
Proper pulling back CCV so he can't stop the second goal?
At least two players should have been sent off?
Beathun not letting us play advantage.
CCV getting booked for winning the ball.
Beathun let them away with murder.

Cheating and incompetence aren't mutually exclusive

 

The ref and two linesmen were shocking I thought

 

Every little coming together was a freekick to Rangers, everytime they were pressed into trouble freekick to Rangers, in the second half of extra time we had set up a man on man attack, pulled back for a freekick to us deep in our own half.

CCV booking won the ball clearly in a fair challenge.

Hagi should have been off, he genuinely had double digit fouls in the game and half of them were for clear cynical stopping the play type fouls. He wasn’t alone Raskin, Diomande both had a good few fouls given against them.

At the end of the day it could have been a penalty, but what hasn’t been mentioned is when was the foul given, if Beaton blew immediately when Scales first pulls back then play has stopped, and let’s face it he blew everytime quick and early for them?

The one person who was clearly at it was the linesman on our left first half and right second, any hint of danger and there was a coming together flag up freekick Rangers. Jefte was a very lucky boy right in front of him with the one where he done Kuhn down the back of the leg I think at 2-1, that should have been a red as it was clearly endangering an opponent and no attempt on the ball. But throw ins all one way and often wrong, as I say promising positions flag up for foul or offside instantly, it was so blatant.

 

Beaton was happy blowing his whistle every single time a Rangers player collapsed onto the pitch - contact or not. The Linesman, enough said...

 

Being totally honest it should’ve been a penalty, Scales was very fortunate. However, what goes around comes around and I for one am * delighted knowing that moment will eat away at the * for weeks and months to come. Get it right round every single hun * who’s hurting today.

 

Their 2nd goal Diomande, Propper is holding CCV back the whole time at the back post, even pulling him with the arm to stop him trying to clear it off the line.

Been near enough nothing said about it.

If the Scales shirt pull is a foul, thats 10x the foul.

 

Not a fashionable opinion but I thought the ref did OK. Tried to let the game flow until the point when players were knackered and just started hauling each out down.

Their penalty shout was the kind of pen that didn't used to be given but is usually flagged and given by VAR. It wasn't a horrible decision, felt pretty marginal, but by the rules it was a pen. Such is life.

 

Just watched back their penalty claim and that is never a penalty, foot on the line. If a ball doesnfully go over the goal line it's not a goal, if it doesn't fully go over the bye line it's not a corner/goal kick, simirly with a shy. Any time a penalty is taken players stand ON the line and it's not infringement

 

On the line is in the box.

Yeah basically Beathun blew the whistle as soon as a he could, thought he was doing them a favour. He blew, so he couldn't give a penalty.

 

Yep. He blew for the foul, rightfully so and that takes away the chance of their penalty as it started outside when he gave the foul..

Unlucky *

 

This. Their equaliser should've been chalked of for a foul way before the whole scales incident and as usual nothing is said.

 

Doesn't matter. Scales kicked him outside the box. Whistle went. So he can't give the penalty as it was for the earlier foul.

 

I recall the last time we went to extra time against them when we lost. We were denied a penalty for handball that was given as a freekick when the offence happened in the box and their winner the Starfelt own goal when Bassey was played in for the cross he was offside. It predated VAR but there was this sense of ohh well not to mention Madden cheated the entire way through the game as Bassey persistently fouled Rogic out the game.

 

I thought Beaton had a surprisingly good game TBH. There was one linesman, though, who definitely had me wondering.

Didn't their player foul CCV just before their penalty shout?