'Honest' mistakes 24/25

He was a terrible ref, never thought he was a cheat though.

 

Extremely difficult to benefit after events have long gone

There will be mistakes made continuously from the SFA.

rinse and repeat.

 

So was Ross hardie who was ref for the huns county game soon as Lawerence makes the foul he shouts done the Mike he got the ball he got the ball then says he got huge amount of the ball they then quickly shout a.p.p twice barely even five seconds after the foul so not to chalk of any goals or pens afterwards ….. video evidence shows Lawerence tackle deserved a booking and he was nowhere near the ball ….. huge amount of the ball would suggest you seen the tackle properly at first hand please tell me theirs a talking to after this as it suspect as *

Collum won’t be flavour of the month amongst the fraternity after these shows getting the go ahead with the audio


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Thought Collum came across really well on Clyde SSB tonight. The orange brethren will be fuming

 

Aye felt that excuse was a bit flimsy.

I get that you can realistically only go so far back in the game, but the (VaR) refs clearly was trying get clean stsrfs of APP as quickly as possible, as many as possible, to not have to use the foul.

Bottom line though, some passes or not, Huns don't get in possession of they don't get away with a bookable offence.

Sent from my M2012K11AG using Tapatalk

 

Honesty and transparency is their kryptonite after all

 

This was really weird for me.

 

Must say though, Collum is doing a much better job of this than Crawford Allan. Refreshing transparency.

 

We wanted transparency and this is certainly a step in the right direction.

The Killie decision is absolutely baffling why that penalty wasn't awarded. I don't think anyone has suggested it wasn't apart from the match day officials.

 

Aye small credit to Collum for stepping forward.
But it's selective transparency and we will see how often this little monthly review actually goes on and what the contradictions are gonna be.

They've selected not to show the offside goals, the ones where they've clearly used the arm as a point of reference.
Would like the transparency on those.

Will also be interesting to see about the contact on Forrest, two players each put a hand on him that would pull his body backwards and thus brings him down. Let's see how that gets viewed when softer or similar happens.
Or the reasoning behind the Kyogo penalty, okay he holds his hands up and accepts that one. But let's see if his reasoning why he suggests the var/ref doesn't give it holds up.
Or the Hun handball. That was a folded arm, elbow OUT, body turning - thus his arm was extended outward of his body - handball, I'll not hold my breath on that one.

Sent from my M2012K11AG using Tapatalk

 

Sent from my 21121210G using Tapatalk

 

Sounds like he knows they're all huns and they couldn't run the game without them. Foreign refs are the only option.

 

what is the benefit of admiting there was a mistake a a month ago ,var is supposedly there to make sure the correct decision is reached during the game . has the hun uwho got it wrong been removed from duties ,fined or is it buisness as usual

 

It's still all going to come down to someone's interpretation of the laws so supporters are still going to feel hard done to about certain decisions. That ref watch on sky sports, there's decisions that they still don't agree on having watched loads of replays.

 

The point is to show it’s being worked on. The time spent on SSB and the YouTube show of him going through decisions can only be a good thing.

 

https://x.com/NotMatondoProp/status...96969.ampproject.net/2408291337000/frame.html

Sent from my 21121210G using Tapatalk

 

Jesus Christ, is that legit audio?

 

Think so

Sent from my 21121210G using Tapatalk

 

Aye it was played in that VAR show from the SFA, wasn't questioned though.