Celtic Supporters Thread (contains GB chat)

Maybe it's Israeli propaganda lol. Actually, going off topic here, it's now been proved that the Israelis actually helped set up Corbyn so Boris would win. Devious tarts they are, they must love us too. Coming back on topic, wait and see first as investigations are on going.

 

As I mentioned mate I’m sure there’s multiple security measures in place.

So that’s nonsense from the club

 

Yeah, I'll never understand why some people think they're above the pyro rules when we've been warned and fined for it repeatedly.

If the stuff about opening fire exists is true then they've got nobody to blame but themselves, there's no defense for that, even if it is a smokescreen and they're really being banned because of the palestine stuff, they've * up and gave them another valid reason to do it.

 

Not seen any videos yet...so...

Many years ago (I apologise now) I was a gate steward at Crystal Palarse (* I hate them but I needed the dosh!) anyway...it was pretty flipping hard to open the gates, they had cameras and on going radio comms, so I'm smelling a bit of BS tbh....

Having been to Millwall more than a few times...there's no way anyone can open a fire exit down there, they've got security and stewards all over the place. If the GB did do that, then ooof that's a potential lawsuit / H&S issue etc for Motherwell on why their security / stewards were so lax. If someone were to die, Motherwell would get sued for being * at their security. Video evidence from their cameras is needed and then the next question will be...where was the gate steward?

However.. I do remember once back in the early 90s Man City the sods once stuck a stick through the main back gate at Selhurst Park and lifted the lock up and almost came rushing through the back gate, I was 19 or something trying to push two massive metal gate doors back for dear life...about 200 fans almost breached it until a few stewards came back and helped me lol

 

The away end at fir park the other week looked ridiculously overcrowded.
Seems every single home game their * doubling up too.

 

Lost for words with this, that board don’t represent Celtic one bit, get rid of the lot of them.

 

Board have made first move

 

The whole lot of them now have to be told were to go. Sack the board!

 

I'm liking your vibe here CB! Taking on the fans over Palestine is a baaaaad move.

 

I thought the fire exit thing was * trying to get out the stadium and the police were barricading it? There wasn’t any fans in sight in the videos.

* knows.

 

Celtic sending emails to fan media now



What a pathetic bunch of *’s running the club

 

Folk need to start facing reality with all this. Bottom line is that as much as a lot of the views the ultra groups are ones we share, there are folk intent on causing * for the sake of it. Daft boys trying to act the ticket.

You come the * you don't start crying 'VICTIM' when you get reprimanded, it's not * primary school ffs. I've issue with the board in terms of picking and choosing which politics are acceptable and which aren't, but the two fan groups think they can do or say whatever the * they want and get away with it. Sorry but no, there has to be some give and take.

 

I agree as much as i dont agree with it the board hold all the power here as much as fans will say sack the board ect this seems like a warning regarding the athletico game.

 

End of the day if the club are goanny get fined and all the rest of it, they've a duty to protect it's interests. They can't just wash their hands of it and go 'ah * it do what yous want'.

By all means stand your ground and do what you think is right, but don't get upset when the club have to be seen to crack down on it. It's so * childish man.

 

Did I miss something? Where is the evidence of anyone "coming the c***? Who has been "crying victim"? Where did they claim they could say whatever they want?

 

I know you're fond of a long, protracted exchange in semantics mate, but not my style. If you don't know what I'm talking about I suggest you look up some of the many issues over the years.

Again I'm more often than not in agreement with the views of the GB, but that's besides the point.

 

False dichotomy: between "just washing their hands of it and going 'ah * it do what yous want,'" and dropping bans for things they have so far produced no evidence for and with no attempt to communicate, there are lots of other options.

They could, for example, be open and honest about their real concerns and have an open, good-faith dialogue with the groups to try to resolve them as a first step.

Also, complaining about a lack of any kind of due process or even communication is not the same thing as "getting upset when the club have to be seen to crack down on [you standing your ground and doing what you think is right].

 

It's not mere semantics, though. You can't just twist what's actually happened by naming them wrongly as a rhetorical technique and then accuse anyone who points this out of being fond of a protracted exchange in semantics.

The fact is that, whether I knew what you meant or not, your description of what has happened was not an accurate description and so any conclusions you draw from it, such as deciding they are childish, are invalid.

 

I couldn't really give a * mate to be honest, I rarely get through your posts so not holding out any hope of a decent discussion with you about it.

 

Mate there’s been there’s been no communication at all from the club


Literally none