Honest Mistakes Thread 2016/17 onwards.

Aye he was arguing there was no contact at all. That’s what a was finding baffling mate

 

Surely whether you're moving or not when you get stood on shouldn't make any difference.

 

What does it matter that he's on the ground. If a player on the ground gets stood on by a guy on his feet it's a foul against the guy on the ground just because he's on the ground??

 

When you’ve majorly misjudged a slide tackle, coming in late, missing the ball and the players trying to control the ball and decks it because you’re still in process of tackling then aye, I think it probably does.


He’s saying there was zero contact and Starfelt wasn’t moving anyway. Which is a load of *.

Canny believe * are more outraged about this than the handball

 

His foot touched his, doesn’t matter who miniscule the contact was or even if Sakala made contact with him - the fact he dives recklessly into a tackle at the very least gives the referee a decision to make.

Complete moronic decision for him to have made, yet totally unsurprising…

 

I've given up

 

there was no contact until sakala steped on him ,if starfelt had made contact with there would be nothing to discuss it would be a pen

 

Isn't VAR involved in everything though? It is then up to VAR to 'advise' the ref to review. Once that happens then the ref has no option. The ref can't take advice (ie 'I think there is a clear case for a penalty there. You need to come to the monitor and have another look) and decide to ignore it. What's the point in VAR in that case. My interpretation of ghe Goldson penalty is Collum has looked at it and decided it wasn't a pen and didn't need reviewed.

 

Don't understand why neither were reviewed by the wee hun ref ? I can see the debate for Starfelf but the one we should have got was a stonewaller.

 

The review on the clash of heads with Maeda and Tavernier was comical when you consider Sakala and Morelos spent tbe opening 20-30 minutes diving. Numerous occasions they were leaving the boot in also

 

Was starfelt’s foot anywhere near the baw? Naw.

This really isn’t very hard to understand….

 

It’s soft but I’d be looking for it to be given at the other end…which it probably wouldn’t be

 

was starfelt foot anywhere near sakala until he stepped on him

 

I've always tried to stay away from calling any ref a cheat. But how the * can Bernabei's penalty decision be not only overturned by VAR but actually deemed worth a second look, the Michael Smith one at Tynecastle then to be reviewed by VAR and deemed not to be worth a look. Throw in the James Sands one at Ibrox when he's the last man aginst Ross Cty I think, and Robertson giving nothing. That from the same ref who gave a pen to Ross Cty for a blatant dive. There is such a long history of outrageously bad decisions against us for it not to be a coincidence

 

It's cause technically Sakala stands on Starfelt so some people think how can you foul someone if they've stood on you.

It is one of those weird ones as theres no other examples, closest is probably how you get a foul if someone jumps over you to win a header but even thats the opposite where you were already in position and they land on you.

I think it's a penalty and would wanted one if it was us.

It wasn't even a soft one of those types where you stand on the other guy, I remember Bruno Fernandes got a penalty for this one



They even gave that with VAR at the game and Fernandes basically jumped onto that guys leg and fell.

 

BBC rolling out the bigoted stuart dougal to give his opinion on Goldshun handball, no surprise at all to see he doesn't think its penalty against his team.

Hahaha the worlds media must be absolutely laughing at these * trying to justify why it wasn't even looked at. You compare it to every handball given against Celtic this season then its clear as day a stone wall penalty. Hahahaha

 

They're not more outraged. There's just no disagreement on the handball. I don't think he made a tackle, I think he was trying to block a cross or shot that Sakala didn't take.

 

Have you watched it?

 

Furious referee Stuart Dougal last night put the boot into his critics after he was forced to scrap a gig at a Masonic lodge Controversial whistler Dougal pulled out of the charity event after his appearance was slammed by football fans, including Celtic supporters.

But he hit out at suggestions of "bias and conspiracy" over his planned speaking engagement tomorrow night in Larkhall, Lanarkshire.

In 2009 days after he retired after doing his final match, the huns at Ibrox where he sent off Mulgrew for the Lafferty dive...

Retired 16 May 2009 after that hun game and then was due to speak at Larkhall Masonic Lodge on the 20 May 2009 4 days later.

 

as i said ,if anyone can show me starfelt makes any contact with him before being stood on i will admit im wrong and that will be that