Honest Mistakes Thread 2016/17 onwards.

I thought theirs was a stonewaller. If it was up the other end we'd be screaming for it.

Goldson handball was another stonewaller

 

You never see their players tying their hands behind their back when the ball is pinging around the box.

Says it all.

 

And there are scum fans claiming it didn't hit his hand.

 

No, not at all mate. Starfelt fouled him.

 

If neither us or the huns were awarded penalties last season, they would've dropped 10 points.

We would've dropped 0.


So far this season, they wouldve dropped 8pts

Again we'd have dropped 0

Mental.

 

No he didn't. VAR and the actual rules get used there, the pen gets overturned.

 

That's your opinion, mine is the opposite.

 

Aye I’m actually surprised anybody thinks different with the one we gave away tbh.


The Goldson one? Nailed on, there’s no way it can’t be a penalty. And we should be asking for the reasoning behind the decision to see what they come up with this time. Cos that was * blatant.

 

How any * could argue their way out it after seeing that angle

You know what angers me most is the club will say nothing

 

Aye its a tricky one, Sakalas foot was ontop of starfelt’s but at the same time Starfelt didn’t touch the ball. The bigger issue is the penalty we didn’t get which was nailed on

 

It's not supposed to be anything to do with opinion though?

Starfelt has slid in for the ball, missed the ball and the man, the man has landed his foot on Starfelts and proceeded to do the splits.

If VAR gets involved there, surely on a technicality it's not a pen, as Starfelt has not initiated contact?

 

That's not what happened. Starfelt didn't miss him.

 

It is, with the majority of the rules its down to refs interpretation. It’s only supposed to be offsides that are nailed down as a yes or no.

The * up handball rules now were down to them trying to change it to clear yes or no.

 

Aye this is it full stop. Starfelt clear as day fouls him. Goldson clear as day should give away a penalty. Not convinced getting that penalty changes the result because we were * but it needs explained.

 

You’ll rarely see me in this thread but * me man the day was ridiculous but expected which sounds like a * up in itself.

 

He did though, it was unfortunate timing on Starfelts part that he happened to put his foot under the boys foot. In real time it looks a definite pen bit VAR is supposed to look at ot in slow mo detail and decide where the foul was.

The boys foot lands on Starfelts foot after Starfelt misses both man and ball. This is what VAR is supposed to determine is it not?

 

starfelt made no contact,you cant give a penalty for sliding past someone

 

His foot doesn't land on Starfelts if Starfelt doesn't stupidly go to ground. Their penalty is beyond doubt, but again, Goldson handball, * me.

 

Hold on a stonewaller. The hun guy stands on Karl Starfelts foot then falls. I canny explain it any simpler than that.

Are we just gettin used tae the huns gettin penalties every week now its just the done thing n we accept it?

* off. If thats a penalty fitba is *. Watch it again on YouTube or Twitter somethin the * stands on big Starfelts foot. He slid in didny win the baw but never took the man. The hun boy stood on him. Thats not a * foul.

 

Thank * somebody on here has a brain. Amen mate.