Brendan Fraudgers!

Makes a * day fun.

 

Aye in the same way it's great to get another dose of genital warts.

 

Lovely.

 

Again, that is common knowledge regarding financial aptitude and still has no relevence to what I have addressed.

Who is insinuating we are up to no good financially? It’s in the accounts we owe DD’s company millions in dividends.

That in no way is contridition and applying it to a minimum is another fringe terminology.

All of they activities you have stated was funded by the supply of Celtic supporters capital, its unbelievable how you have just stated that without him we wouldn’t have got it. That is * unbelievable. Slave mentality.

I didn’t? Then why did I praise the Board getting Rodgers because it reflected Celtic size? Another nonsense argument.

Putting the reserves we have into the Park with both promising and proven quality of players.

 

He's said before that January is our most important window because of the qualifiers. Have faith in more players coming lads.

 

I do actually agree with one point that Minimalist makes. We should expect that the manager of Celtic is of the calibre of Brendan Rodgers. If you see yourself as a Champions League level club then that starts with the manager.

The most expensive person on our football staff i.e. players/management should be the manager. For too long we have gone with the cheap option hoping for them to be the diamond in the rough. Lennon was the exception and even last 16 champions league campaigns didn't encourage the board to release more funds.

I am not one to be quick to praise the board for merely fixing a mistake.

 

A masterclass in circumlocution. Your simplifying of us putting capital in equating guaranteed success on the field with zero input at boardroom or management level is a total false dichotomy. Anyway I'm bored going round in circles, we'll agree to disagree...Mon the Desmond.

 

I'm glad you can recognize this yourself. I was under the belief a very large majority had this neuroses about the Board.

 

Once again you're full of this perpetuating assumptions that when asking to push out the boat we won't get success. Always and I mean ALWAYS a negative connotation EVERYTIME any one asks the Board to push the boat out and ill reiterate again, its completely indoctrinated from Millionaires and a Billionaire that sit on the Board. It's completely clear a large proportion of the support want these 'owners' to be rich at our expense and just throw any other excuse not to represent our size. That's your problem, not mines.

I'll be honest with you RB, you might think this is obscene, but your man DD couldn't give a flying * about you who try and justify DD. His handicap means more than turning up to the AGM and all the other Billionaire arrogance. It's not my problem that you cannot handle the truth.

 

Good post Minimalist great to have you back.

 

Every penny should be reinvested into the club..

Only with Fans having the majority shareholding could we try and ensure this happens.

 

Good to have you back Minimalist. I've always liked your passion and particularly our shared belief that far too many people in football including the fans think like businessman or someone consuming a product rather than supporters or football people.

 

That would also depend on which managers wanted to work for us.

 

Especially our Club. It's all down to the conditioning. I don't understand our supporters who inhabit this audience of using Billionaires and Millionaires context of authority; handing them our money through the PLC apparatus regardless of result and representation. I'm not even in this thread to even impose conclusions from the position of authority either when I pay my money to see us play like any other supporter. It's not surprising that when giving reasoning surrounding facts on the PLC fellow supporters just regurgitate the PLC's narrative and mainstream dialogue and tell supporters like myself to support someone else. Judging by the neuroses within the support you'd need to be Billionaire status to even put emphasis into some sort of opinion as our support clearly places on perceived authority (DD and PL) are absolute and any other alternative is treated as nothing more than obfuscated nonsense while being under the illusion that DD and PLC aren't in it for cynicism. This completely confirms the facts and feedback from many within the support that any sort of ambition is met with inevitable indoctrination like a predictable set of cards; compare to a Deadco when its a vast ocean between the two when people are advocating us spending the money we earn or use the context of authority through Lawwell's narrative and try to justify DD's reputation. To me that is slave mentality.

Imagine that, supporters wanting the best for the Club rather than using it as a conduit means to create a higher standard of living for Millionaires and Billionaires at the expense of us Celtic supporters firing in our hard earned money. Insane that.

 

this neurosis
these neuroses

 

Jamie, if you think Desmond and Lawwell don't want what's best for the club, then you're ignoring all evidence from the past 20+ years and living outside of reality.

 

I don't believe they want 'what's best for the Club' when they have maneuvered our revenue for profits on the basis they want the Club functioning for profit and is perfectly justified regardless of performance on the Park putting Business far higher in the importance scale than the Football department. I mean, Lawwell has been paid astronomically without winning a single trophy. Lawwell appointed Deila, threw him under the bus and came out stated we took the risk, Lawwell came out in 2009 and apologized we weren't ambitious enough and lost the League. DD invested into Celtic on the cheap.

But since you've just assumed im living outside of reality you're right and im wrong and they facts must be complete *.

 

Gonnae * stop that.

 

Perhaps he is German.