[Mafia] Mafia 11 - Mean Streets

3- Bogunda - Dazza, SummerTime, Minty
1- Che - Tim
1- Dazza - Bogunda
1- Anton - Che
1- Cena - Greenman
1- SummerTime - Scotia
1- Minty - Anton
1 - V - Idioteque

 

going out minty but check back me an jc post on him and he miracously appeared talking gibberish , straight after philly said mafia can talk during the day .

 

All our votes are too spread our, will need to be a big swing for a lynch..

No decent rationale yet imo..

 

You taking about Summertime?

 

He's senile if so.

unvote bogunda
vote minty
you're playing different Minty

 

That's a poor reason to vote someone. I don't think I am playing any differently anyway. I'm just as active in trying to find mafia as I always am.

 

Well, you would know...

You are playing differently - in fact, you're being pig ignorant.

I've asked you umpteen times now simple, reasonable and polite questions - yet, no reasonable answer.

 

2- Bogunda - Dazza, Minty
2- Minty - Anton, Summer
1- Che - Tim
1- Dazza - Bogunda
1- Anton - Che
1- Cena - Greenman
1- SummerTime - Scotia
1 - V - Idioteque

Just under 2 hours till deadline.

 

@Mr. Slippyfist

That was my reasoning. I apologise if you think I've been pig ignorant. I thought I had already explained myself.

 

We've got under 2 hours to the deadline.

I think we need to make a lynch. I implore people to vote for Mr.Slippyfist. This is based on the fact that he was pushing for a lynch against Che, who is considered to be a good player. I think he's wrong on Che, as I believe Che's explanation from yesterday about his inactivity.

 

Right, fair enough I apologise for calling you "pig ignorant".

I just don't think you've explained yourself at all - especially since Tim Time was the first one to vote for che, yet you voted for because of MY early pressure?

Plus, as I say, you already agreed that my logic was reasonable - if you think I'm mafia, fair enough, but I'm struggling to understand the logic behind it.

 

So was Tim Time, why are you not "imploring" for a vote on him?

Minty is trying like * to have me lynched, without ANY credible evidence. Plus, the tactics of his game is different from most, right out the traps to protect Che, which I thought was admirable but he's totally contradicting himself with every post.

• he agreed my logic in regards to che was acceptable
• he himself used the same logic against bororob, but retracted it (as did I over Che when minty produced information that no one except moderators was aware of - unfair influence)
• calls me out for pushing for a lynch, yet here he is on his soapbox asking....no, "imploring" for me to be lynched.......

Unvote: Dazza

Vote: Minty

 

I guarantee you are mafia.

 

I've already explained why I want to lynch you over Tim Time, you're more likely to be mafia.

 

You have explained nothing, all you have said every time is "you're more likely to be mafia".

How the * is that explaining it, plus the fact I have asked you umpteen times to explain it, without success....

 

No you can't, hence why you've failed to produce one single shred of evidence.

It's your opinion, and nothing else.

 

3- Minty - Anton, Summer, Bogunda
2- Bogunda - Dazza, Minty
1- Che - Tim
1- Anton - Che
1- Cena - Greenman
1- SummerTime - Scotia
1 - V - Idioteque

 

No one sticks out for me to vote, I see your points on Bogunda, but your playing far more aggressively than normal

 

Not really. I used to come into day 1 like a bull in a china shop. It rarely achieved anything so I had to change how I played. I've explained my thoughts quite clearly tbf.

 

How can you possibly say that ? Am thinking I wasn't wasting my time rattling your tree now