Is it acceptable to boo a celtic player for poor performances

We aren't, we can be but we just aren't. Maybe at times.

 

You do what you like. But by that logic you think it's okay to boo him too. Cause what's the difference really?

 

Birthday card pish.

 

Yup.

 

Absolutely, it was unacceptable he treated us like that.

The same applies when myself and fellow tims boo the team after doing very very poor.

Or I just could be a scumbag then like the rest who adhere to that behaviour and be branded "not real fans" that some proclaim in here. It must make them feel better with that condescending pretentious claim of importance because they don't agree with our actions.

 

Viduka was a different case as I said though. When it comes to a player just not having a good game, I don't like to see him booed or abused from the stands. I can't see how it helps.

 

I think if the guy/guys is/are giving their all then the answer is undeniably no it is never acceptable.

 

Of course the answer is yes. We reserve the right to boo whoever we fucken want.
If I see the * on Wednesday I'll boo him again.

 

You've no grown up since attending panto as a wean have you.

 

Are you going to the game or will you just boo him on here ?

 

To be honest the moral ambiguity around this is pathetic. The booing from my interpretation was a indirect rendition to Rodgers to basically highlight him to stop playing because he constantly * up. I think its logical not to play a player who consistently is at fault for us, don't you think? Its actual unbelievable while some within this forum just automatically dismiss in a pretentious way to Doc when he used the context that this is Rodgers nativity, which I agree with. Its not problem that many of us can't handle the truth, what you get on the park is what you get with him. If Rodgers fields him this is what happens and it seems if you highlight it in your own way (booing, shouting in frustration or whatever) its just seems like its an outrage to show someone is actual * in the squad.

I know its a problem to highlight it as they cannot handle the reality and many want inferiority at the Club and will defend and use the Club and Rodgers context of authority over the facts around Ambrose that hes probably the worst player I have ever seen for us. After all, its tin pot mentality and thats how it demonstrates throughout Europe for us.

Even having to explain is the apotheosis of how backwards our Club is under the recruitment. Its so embarrassing.

 

Cant you anticipate that it was just a friendly and come to the confusion that we have a defensive crisis. We've also just apprehended Toure so the manager is obviously aware of our defensive definitions.

 

You slabber some amount of * pal, none of your fancy pants words will deflect away from it........

 

This is the thing, just because Brendan managed at Swansea and Liverpool dozent give him indemnity against naivety.In the case of Ambrose, Brendan by continuing to play him, is signalling to the rest of the squad I will always find a way to accommodate you, no matter how big a clot you are, it is also signalling to the squad that mediocrity is acceptable in the team. I'm not buying this excuse that Brendan dozen't have any other alternatives, he does, he could play Ajer or Lustig there, maybe even Janko at a push, so stop with this pish he has no other alternatives, it is naivety on Brendan's part, the only other thing it could be is Christian charity on Ambrose, because when Brendan was asked about Ambroses " performance " against Barcelona he said " Bless him he is such an unlucky player ", Christian charity maybe ? if so misguided and naive in this case.

 

* *

 

janko at centre half

 

Ambrose is in the team because of a * defensive crisis!

Rodgers has also just brought in Toure so is well aware of the need for defenders

Lastly, and I cant stress this enough. IT WAS A * FRIENDLY.

Honest to * there are some amount of simpletons on here.