MP suspended Over Anti-Semitic Comments

That is not true. It was devised and agreed upon before they started to lose the war.

Not only that, but they were already mass killing Jews with a variety of different methods, before the implementation of The Final Solution. The Final Solution was only a method and system of killing, not the plan to kill them.

They couldnt kill them fast enough which is why they devised the plan, not because they just then decided to kill them as they were losing the war.

 

What do you mean? She's apologised to try and salvage her career.. And probable expulsion from the Labour Party.

Conversely if she had stuck to her guns she'd be a much more interesting character and probably would have had more of a career.. People respect strong opinion even if they don't agree with it!

 

In the early years Hitler created the situation that forced the Jews to leave, ie: kill some and the rest will flee in terror, millions did so. This is what has been done and continues to be done to over 5.5 million Palestinians.

 

The conspiracy theorist in me says that thats not the only reason she apologised, I have no proof to back this up though.

 

Nah you are mixing up the labour party and the Kremlin , we are allowed to laugh at people who hold vile/stupid views .. something you should be used to by now :smiley-laughing002:

As for the timing of the final solution, you are talking * it was started long before then. I guess that's the risk you run when you spend so much time on some of the websites you obviously trawl about on

 

To be fair, look how doing something about Stalin turned out for Hitler...

 

Oh ok then...:smiley-laughing002:

Listen.. I've got no time for Zionists and their State..

But surely any reasonable person can see that to compare a people who had 6m people slaughtered with regime that carried those murders is at best provocative...ffs..:smiley-laughing002:

 

Who made that comparison?

Got a link?

 

So, you are saying you expect a final solution next? Or that it wouldnt surprise you?

 

Which, funnily enough, were actually illegal! :smiley-laughing002:

None of those war tribunals was anything other than examples of posturing for political purposes. The prosecuting forces acted as judge, jury and executioner, which was farcical.

In fact, some would argue that the World Jewish Congress saw an opportunity to further the agenda of a "homeland" for Jews by applying pressure to ensure that the trials of the *'s wouldn't focus on the invasions of Austria, Czechoslovakia, The Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, France, Denmark, Yugoslavia, Greece, Norway and Western Poland and the people who paid the price for it.

Unless those people were Jewish. Going by a lot of historical records you'd think that only the Jews suffered during World War II.

Of course, that's not the fault of the Jewish people, but rather the politicisation of the situation by various Zionist societies who saw an opportunity to force the hand of the UN in "giving" them their own land.

One of the Presiding Judges in the Nuremberg Trials, Charles F. Wennerstrum, an Iowa Supreme Court justice actually had this to say following the "trials";

US Supreme Court Chief Justice Harlan Fiske Stone also commented;

and some other opinions from the era of those either involved or closely linked to proceedings;

Even Milton R. Konvitz, a Jewish specialist of law and public administration who taught at New York University had concerns about these "trials";

So yeah, they were a complete farce. The Allied Forces who conducted the "trials" violated international law, and went to lengths that were never seen again.

No one was dealt with in a similar fashion for the Soviet military action in Hungary in 1956 or Czechoslovakia in 1968. No British leader was tried when the British invaded Egypt in 1956. The US were never brought to trial for the invasion of Lebanon in 1958, the invasion of Cuba in 1962, the invasion of Vietnam or the Dominican Republic, and certainly none of the US or British leaders who have invaded numerous Middle-Eastern countries have faced anything of the sort.

The timeline of events says it all, really.

The war end in September 1945, the "trials" begin in November 1945, and in November 1947 the UN Partition Proposal "gives" the Zionists 20% of Palestine to create their own homeland of Israel.

Israel, in a sign of things to come, seize 70% of Palestine, a full 50% more than originally promised them.

And in a shocking twist of irony, those Zionists who used the persecution of Jews to further their own agenda are actually wiping out the Palestinians with similar disregard.

Sure, they're being ever so slightly smarter about it. We're seeing children being gunned down by soldiers, houses and property being destroyed, 95% of their water being unsafe for drinking, and more than 2/3 of the population don't have adequate access to food and other basic supplies, which doesn't make quite the same headlines as gas chambers, but the results are the same.

By 2020 Palestine is going to be uninhabitable according to the UN, and those who survive there for that long will not be long before dying.

So yeah, different tactics, but the aim and outcome will be the same.

Being Zionists, they're rather more sneaky and covert about how they do things. Like I said above, the final solution will have been implemented by 2020.

After all, why use gas chambers when you can just starve a people of their basic supplies and allow them to die off slowly?

Israel has time, there's no rush. No one's going to stop them.

 

Angus page 4.. :smiley-laughing002:

 

* knows what the lunatics are planning ???

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i4OXmO3T2vc[/ame]


I,d say if the State of Israel was in danger of collapsing either by war or some other reason, then many Palestinians trapped in the WB and Gaza would meet their end.

 

I think if that ever happens, we will all be * anyway.

 

Very interesting and all that Davy...

And you'll get no arguments from me in what Israel are doing or are capable of doing.. (Nuclear capability etc)

The comparison I'd say with the final solution are, well some way off the mark.

But if we return to what the thread is about her comments were stupid if she didn't believe them..

 

What was the final solution, Anton?

 

I'll always find it funny how the concentration camps inspected by the Americans after the war were all asserted to be concentration camps, whereas the concentration camps inspected by the Soviets turned out to be death camps..

 

Will answer later need to take the kids to beavers...:smiley-laughing002:

 

I'm not sure what your are implying here, would you mind explaining?

 

Maybe that was the plan all along ??

Syria, Iran, and Hezzbollah along with the various Palestinan resistance movements could very well turn their attention to Israel when the Jihadist insurgency has been nullified.

With the Golan being the initial battleground ????

The destruction of the Dome would also most likely ignite a large conflict!


http://www.haaretz.com/settlementdollars/1.690821

Like I said, "* knows what the lunatics are planning" ?