Dermot Desmond

Smoke a joint and have a day off ffs.

 

I'm not into the aul drugs now but I wonder if some posters are or if they just troll me for the craic. Like the football hooligan Aberdeen fan who with his wee pet can make up lies in an attempt to discredit me. I do wonder if they are participating in an outright agenda against me or if they do actually go full * and believe they lies they post about me. hahaha I used the word skim which admittedly was not the correct adjective to use and them head the balls are acting like "I shat it" or other nonsense. Do they actually think I accused the club of being involved in a criminal conspiracy and then backed down over their posts? What is constant though is that when this sort of thing is brought up the attack dogs come out and try to force the issue off topic which I realize I should not be feeding mu commenting so I will quote myself and bring my original post back into view:

 

Salaries = £1.3m



Perpetuity liability to Dermot Desmond (Line Nominees Limited) = £4.2m



CCPS annual payment = £0.5m



_____


Total = £6m out of a £51m turnover makes 11% of our revenue went to the Board.

 

Perhaps we should "skim" over the old post.......

 

og1 , how many points on player sales does Lawwell kick up to Tony Soprano ?

 

Well to be blunt...if you want * to throw millions into a club you can't sit and moan like * when shareholders want a return for their risk.

Its real life not * fifa 99 on what ever we are on now.

 

Eh...... What?

 

He thinks that the board are pumping money into the club and not getting anything back. He doesn't know that the likes of DD made money from us in the long run.

 

No, i think there are people on the board who are share holders and others including DD who are getting money out of the club in payments as is their right to do so.

Of course the millions i'm referring to is when they bought shares.

 

I think you should show me these lies I have made up about you in fact you should go and report them go on ...

Would you like to explain what the "Perpetuity liability" is ...

:smiley-laughing002: Aye best we just "skim" over that .. He knew exactly what he meant/implied ,as no-one is that stupid as to not know what skimming means in terms of money

 

11% of turnover and this is not including the guaranteed annual dividends that are also paid out to foreign banks and also not including the couple of million "exceptional expenses" that are paid out every year sometimes as much as eight figures.

It would be interesting to see how these PLC payments compare to our annual wage bill which is around 35 million. This would be especially interesting if represented in graph form.

 

Lets put it another way...without a return there would be no club.

You can't have it both ways...not in the real world and most of the people slagging those shareholders would not put the sort of money into the club that they did without getting a return.

 

Its beyond insanity when you think about it, some actually think he became a billionaire by not taking money?

No wonder we are in the state we are in.

So tell me, the Board are running the Club like a PLC business for the shareholders for their payment does this benefit us?

You do know these are CCP shares, you do know that right?

 

What? We pay Dermot Desmond in perpetuity due to CCP with a 6% interest rate (which is the £0.5m). "perpetuity" = Forever.

 

So let me get this straight.

Theres some out there that believe we can't spend the money we have. Theres some out there that believe DD doesn't take money out the Club. Theres some out there that believe we can't buy players from England although we do. Theres some out there that believe Lawwells son is not intertwined with our Man City transfers. Theres some out there that refuse Lennon stating publicly that he left due to downsizing.

To be honest I think its just the general refusal to believe that the Club is completely taking the pish right out of us while there is no logic to back this structure, its * pathetic.

 

First two...who said any of that today.

The rest.......what the * has any of that got to do with what was talked about today.

 

* me ?
I would say you are challenged.

 

It doesn't matter what period it was stated, its the general collective perception that is being outlined thats insulting the fanbase.

 

I am more interested to know why some posters lose the bap when this sort of thing is brought up? My conscience is clear in terms of intentions, I simply want to learn where the money is being spent and why are we not spending more on our first team?

I would not even say that the howling at the moon folk who lose their * when questions of club policy are brought up are plants or anything. They are not subtle, articulate, devious, or crafty enough to arouse suspicion. They are normal Celtic fans who ridicule the discussion, or stick their head up their own hole. I dont know why anyone would take this stance either. Do they prefer the left hand not knowing what the right hand is doing? Or is it straight denial in a bla bla bla i am not listening kind of way?

I used to think the problem was with me personally in that people are just going to rubbish what I say out of spite and past instances of me ripping them to shreads but it's not that either because other posters who are asking are getting the same treatment. It's beyond bizarre.

 

Hope you get the response you are looking for with this post so you can play the victim in a few pages time.
Good luck.