1. Having trouble logging in by clicking the link at the top right of the page? Click here to be taken to the log in page.
    Dismiss Notice

Should footballers be sacked?

Discussion in 'TalkCeltic Pub' started by Colin McRae, Jul 13, 2007.

  1. What do you think, should it be more common for a footballer to get sacked?
    i think so, take tommy. hes refusing to leave but hes not doing what was asked of him when he came in the door now anyone else in anyother type of work would get sacked. also, surly, if a player is under contract and he is told he's wanted to go else were on a loan deal he should not have a choice in the matter? at the end of the day, in any other line of work if your told to go work in another place you dont get a choice.
     
    #1 Colin McRae, Jul 13, 2007
  2. * rite they shud b sacked!

    also shud be a 20k per week wage cap
     
    #2 Mark S, Jul 13, 2007
    yes
     
    #3 T.D., Jul 13, 2007
  4. Why sack an asset? Your as well trying to get money for him even if it is a small amount, even enough to cover the wages in the last 12 month. I dont think its written into a contract that he has to perform to a certain level, but when big mick gets the captaincy I think he and strach should grab the big baldy * by the throat and get him told or he's gonna get his baws booted, Glesga style.
     
    #4 Mr Nice, Jul 13, 2007
  5. its not written into my contract taht i have to perform to a certain level , but if i dont i could get the sack

    i agree with the rest though, well apart from glasgow style, i'm thinking john smeaton style.
     
    #5 Colin McRae, Jul 13, 2007
  6. Football has officially gone even more crazy this season. Fifa/Uefa had the chance in the 90's to introduce transfer and wage caps but chose not to probably because they are all greedy gits too!
     
    #6 derryduck, Jul 13, 2007
  7. In American Football you can cut a player and only take a small hit on your money and the player is released without any money being guaranteed to him.
     
    #7 T.D., Jul 13, 2007
  8. Proper Order! :fear::fear::fear: JJ, KM and TG anyone?
     
    #8 derryduck, Jul 13, 2007
  9. unfair on kenny miller, he atlest dose as hes told and gives it 100%
    jiri on the other hand gives 1% and tommy dosn't do what hes told.
    they too should be on nat. min wage imo.
     
    #9 Colin McRae, Jul 13, 2007
  10. Id say give players short term contracts but with the option of extending them to a lkater date so sign for 1 year and if they perform give them another year and have that the club decides if they give the year and the palyer dosnt have a choice and have it for a certain amount of years.
    This way you can sack them and they woulndt get much money
     
    #10 celticmad117, Jul 13, 2007
  11. problem is if he does * hot and the teams with the money come calling they are off. at least under contract you can sell or keep
     
    #11 Mr Nice, Jul 13, 2007
  12. Players can be sacked - for breach of contract.
     
    #12 Martin, Jul 13, 2007
  13. I would settle for £20K a week. Beats the giro (only kidding)
     
    #13 the ships cat, Jul 13, 2007
  14. Yeah they should have like a maximum wage per week. We don't want them all ending like Becks...
     
    #14 Celtic_Lass, Jul 13, 2007
(You must log in or sign up to post here.)
Toggle Width
Style
UI.X Green
iHax Community
iHax Community