Syrian Rebel EATS heart

He was given that war. He did not start it. So he has to think of a way of getting his troops out without leaving chaos. Bush and Blair can be classed as evil time will tell if Obama will be. Though he does want to get the troops out of Afgan.

 

George W Bush,Barack Obama,Tony Blair,David Cameron ?

All leaders who have killed children and used torture (without simplistic Hitler comparisons).

The Assad regime is only genuinely doing exactly what the leaders I mentioned falsely claimed to,trying to destroy a terrorist movement that seeks to destroy his country (and way of life).

 

Yeah he wants to keep power and will do anything to keep his dictatorship.

 

yes assad kills children (sounds eerily similar to the 'bayoneting babies in the incubator propaganda from the gulf war) e.t.c thats why all the syrian people support him?

If this was even true then why would he want to commit 'suicide' by giving the extremists an excuse to destroy the country..

the syrian army exist to fight for the all the people. if they're such murderers and child killers then how is it that they haven't already lost the conflict..

 

Killing babies and children won't make you lose anything. He has power and is supported with weapons. The people know if they go against him and he wins they and their people will be wiped off the map. Some are brave enough to fight back and hopefully they win for the good of mankind. There was a good doc on C4 about the conflict it was not biased and was in both camps. It was an incite iinto how he gets some Sunni Muslims top fight for him. they are often put into a house and are not allowed any contact with their Sunni family or brothers so that they don't know what is going on and are brainwashed to fight for Bashir. Some have escaped and learned the truth and end up fighting for the rebels.

 

As he said.

Spot on.

He, he, he, he, the westies are nervous because their plans aren't so great. Ha, ha, Assad is fighting, they can not invade Syria and get to Iran...

People can say whatever they want. the fact is that most of the Syrians support Assad, more than those fundamentalists (among them Chechen fundamentalists, the same kind of people who killed people in Boston). The funniest thing here is how the west helps "the rebels " in Syria, but when they do something against them, that is a terrorist act.

More and more, people see that the west don't care for Assad or Syria, Iran is the only aim.
Rebels ate man's heart, that video about Wahhabies who treat women like a lower race. If Assad's fighters did it, we would watch it 24/7, and now, hardly ever mention it.

 

the army would lose their support, even more so from the minorities. the army's sole purpose is to preserve syria's secular foundation. murdering children and babies will turn everyone against them, thus the goal of preservation would cease to exist and the army would fall apart. It would be suicide for them to do this as the 'rebels' would get support and assad would be signing his own death warrant and sending the country into a dark hole.

the wahibbis want to drive a wedge between both islamic sects as well as all the other religious and ethnic minorities...it's the only way syria can be destroyed.

 

"Chechen fundamentalists" What are you on about?! Now that is Neo-con bullshit propaganda right there lol. Boston bombers spent most of their life in America they are American. They were not even from Chechnya. They were from a nation that is near Chechnya only as children. They were racially Chechen and that's it. They had no training from any group in Chechyna. And so called Chechen "fundamentalists" have every right to defend themselves and rule all over themselves. They are not Russians so why should they be a slave to Russia. Serbs did some of the most disgusting and depraved things to Bosnians but I would not say Serbs are evil because of that. Some soldiers do evil things in war. Like that idiot that eat a bit of the dead man's heart.

 

While I disagree with your other points on the thread - you are right about Chechens and the land of Chechnya. * willing they will be free.

 

And I don't say about whole the Chechen nation ( and honestly, I don't care about their aims, as far as I am concerned, they can do whatever they want with their territory) I say fact is that 200 Russian citizens fight with the rebels, the same kind of people that killed kids in Beslan and they are fine.
All Serbians who were accused for the crimes are jailed, but all Muslims who killed Serbs are free. Among them , many mujahedeens who beheaded people. The same people who killed some of my cousin's family. I love when people don't know with whom they are talking.
When Swedish and Danish television showed documentaries that showed what lead to the Srebrenica and they killed Serbs 3 years before the 1995 massacre, they got many treats from the Muslim diaspora.
So, Serbs are punished, while Muslim butchers walk free. I don't see justice there.

I agree, that every individual has to be responsible for his act, but if Assad's soldier did it, I am sure that all western media would show it 34365 per day.

 

Yeah right no Serbs walked free plenty of Serbs walked free. Most will never be in any court. My friend served in Serbia and the things used to tell us about like Serbians playing football with heads of whoever they had just butchered. Rapes of Catholic nuns, genocides of whole Muslim families.

Russia attacks Chechnya on a daily basis we the world are not even told half what goes on. Russia are brutal. Beslan was * up but if someone kills your family rapes your people it is very difficult not to want some kind of revenge and take your war to THEIR cities. If Russia are destroying Chechnya then why should the Chechens not attack Russia?. Especially as Russia has no right to be in Chechnya.

 

All Serbs who were accused, were in jail. Serbia has delivered all war crimes suspects.
Prove it.
I can post video clip plenty of fundamentalists who pose with head of Serbs.
Following your logic:If Muslims killed 3500 Serbian civilians, why shouldn't Serbs kill them later?
As I said, I don't say about the whole Chechen nation, they can decide what they want, I don't think bad about the whole Chechen nation, I just say that 200 Chechen fighters-the same kind of people who killed the kids in Beslan are in Syria.

 

I can't be bothered to go through Google looking at gory pictures and videos of Serb massacres. It would take me weeks. There is a lot of pictures and I'm really not into looking at gory pictures. But I know you are Serb and what you get told about the war is a Serbian view and you love your nation and it's people. So I expect a nationalistic view on things. I have a good Serbian mate and he is the same. We just have very different opinions about it. But even he would not come out with a comment like no Serb got away with any crime.

Beslan -Russians killed more kids than the Chechen fighters in Beslan siege. Typical Russian tactics shoot first. Russian forces used tanks and flamethrowers. They wanted the kids dead, it helped them to portray the whole of Chechnya as "Terror zone" it was during the time of America's war on Terror. So they suddenly they had support to go into Chechnya and do what they like which they did.

 

A few weeks ago it was all over BBC,Sky and Al Jazeera that evidence has been collected, proving the use of chemical weapons in Syria. I distinctly remember Sky asking (the defence secretary) whether it was Assad and whether that would lead to UN/UK involvement and denied it, said they couldn't act because they never knew who was responsible.

Obama and Kerry spoke within the last couple of days saying there was now evidence that both sides had used chemical weapons.

I don't see any unjustified bias by the western media. If you ban free speech in your county you'd be a moron not to expect journalists to condemn you and call you evil (which you are). At the same time the media is not supporting the rebels, it often reports on rebel atrocities and doesn't make any argument for arming rebels. If anything the media has tried to pressure Russia into stepping in to stop Assad and tomorrow Russia chairs a conference seeking to end the war. How can that be bad?

 

Do they really? evidence??

By your logic N.Ireland shouldn't re-join the Republic then right?

 

most people in Chechnya themselves didn't want the war, neither did some of the soldiers or officers in the russian army.

though the russian president at the time thought otherwise and russia ended up getting kicked out. tough luck russia:smiley-laughing002::smiley-laughing002:. though since then russia has poured loads of money into grozny for infrastructure and development.


as for the boston bombing I don't even believe those two kids did it.

 

names?

more so the other half of the jigsaw puzzle.

never heard about the catholic nuns thing. as for playing football using peoples heads..if it was us, then it would make 6 o clock news.

never seen any evidence to support that. sounds like propaganda technique to me..just like when 60 minutes showed a bosnian funeral after a 'massacre' , though only later truth comes out it was a Serbian funeral..cross and everything..yet everyone believed it was a bosnian funeral.

 

Not everything makes the news especially in those days. I got told by a Serb about the head incident. And Russia is putting money into Chechnya because it wants easy access to the oil. If you think they are putting money in to help the chechens then you really are deluded.

 

Why would you believe anything Obama or Kerry say regarding Syria?

The Western Media is so biased,that they call the 'rebels' rebels,instead of insurgents,terrorists,militants or extremists,and that's exactly what they'd be classed as if they were fighting against the Israelis or the Brits or the Yanks.

See through the propaganda,it's so blatant.

The agenda is regime change,not helping innocent people,don't swallow the bullshit lies that people seem to fall for every single time,we saw it happen in Libya,and elsewhere,and we should all know better by now.

 

Read that again. Ffs so moronic.