Suarez the Cannibal

Suarez' history of controversial incidents done him no favours.

 

Maybe they have a league in North Korea that will appreciate his talent

 

If you mean DPRK, yes, I have no doubt he would flourish there.

Although, DPRK breads fine athletes. If you care to watch their games, you would know all about it. Suarez would definitely be challenged in DPRK.

 

Jong Tae-Se, now theres a proper footballer, playing for the passion of playing for his country, i would say hes proberly the last of them in the world.

 

a 'playful bite' ? Jesus *. He deserves more? Dead right he deserves more. It should have been a 15 game ban. * rodent.

 

Spot on.

By he deserves more I meant he deserves more respect and acknowledgement.

 

I think people dont like the double standards, you know for a fact if a English player did the same they would get no where near a 10 match ban, i have no time for Liverpool or Suarez but i taught 10 was too harsh..

 

How long was Defoe banned for when he bit someone? Oh wait he wasn't.

 

When are people going to realise that once a player is dealt with on the pitch by way of a yellow or red card the fa can't intervene ..

 

Well i taught the best way of looking at it was the difference between Suarez/Terry racism
Suarez got 8 match ban, Terry 4 match ban, even tho there was video proof of what Terry said and more evidence imo.
So its def not beyond the FA to be more lenient against one of there own.

 

That's pretty stupid though.


Why can't they? No one would have complained if they punished Defoe for that bite.

Is this apart of their whole "don't undermine the refs" philosophy? Well guess referee's do get decisions wrong,the FA has a duty to ensure that justice is delivered and on too many occasions they do * all.

Like Rooney's elbow on McCarthy or that ridiculous tackle on Hiadara not so long.

 

I'm well aware of that, it's stupid as * though. How can they possibly justify booking a player for an offence and banning another for 10 games for that same offence? If Suarez had of been booked I'm pretty certain they would of vent the rules to issue him with some sort of ban. They need to sort out this disciplinary procedure because it is an absolute joke.

It was a scumbag thing for Suarez to do, and he very much deserved to be punished for it, but 10 games is very harsh. Especially considering they didn't take any previous offences into account.

If a player breaks another players leg today with a shocking tackle they will be banned for 3 games, is what Suarez did really worse than breaking another's leg? It's all very inconsistent

 

Spot on

 

That's not strictly true though. Ben Thatcher got a lengthy ban after picking up a yellow for elbow smashing Mendes

 

Aye that rule is one of the biggest piles of nonsence in football, that if a ref deals with it then you cant do anything after. The ref deals with a football match while its being played and then it finishes. So either you can do what you want after the match or you cant do anything as the match is done.

Because why then can you get red cards rescinded? the Referee took action in the game. Yet I dont think you can get yellow cards rescinded, why is that? dont understand why you can appeal reds but not yellows.

 

Difference is if a player break another's leg going for the ball it is completely different to sinking your teeth into another players arm .

 

Yes, I'd rather be slightly bitten than have my leg broken and career potentially ruined tbh.

 

Ye ok if you say ! It's pre meditated .. Some of the leg breaks are pure accidents ..if dogs bite people they are put down ... I'm not sayin Suarez should be I'm saying its very serious and should be dealt with ...

 

Are the Scousers really singing, He bites who he wants, at Newcastle

 

Quite possibly the biggest over-reaction ever hit football this...........