New Kits 13/14

The Bradford shirt is very nice. Much nicer than their last away shirt

 

Sponsor on that Derby kit is terrible

 

Thank * we're not sponsored by buy mobiles :smiley-laughing002:

 

Really like the norwich top.

 

Possibly the most embarrassing advertising schtick I've had the displeasure of gazing upon this year.

Canaries and wolves don't mix.

 

that Norwich advert is cheesy as *.

 

think that advert is pretty sweet

 

They did try running with "Who's afraid of the big bad canary?", but it didn't elicit much response.

 

Norwich shirt is a belter might treat myself to one need a new Premier League shirt to buy

 

To be fair, the whole Van Wolfswinkel thing slipped my mind.

Still tacky though! :smiley-laughing002:

 

It is a nice top for sure. One of the better ones I have seen for the new season so far.

 

Jeezo

That Derby kit is absolutely ruined by the size of that * sponsor!

Hope they're gettting plenty o' cash for it..........

 

Is that made from cotton? :smiley-laughing002:

 

No, Polymicro sports polyester with breathable mesh on the inside for wearer comfort. Ribbed white polyester collar and cuff

And it's the best shirt on this entire thread, classic simplicity and not vandalised with some * sponsor

 

Only coz no-one will sponsor them. :smiley-laughing002:

 

How wrong you are, it's because the fans don't want to have one, see below from the club's constitution

THAT: A new Rule 125 (Advertising) of the Club’s Constitution be adopted, as follows:-

"ADVERTISING

125. The clothing (i.e. playing kit) of players representing the Club shall not include any advertising thereon, except as follows, which shall not be considered to be advertising:-

a. The trade mark (i.e. logo) and/or name of the clothing manufacturer or a combination of same, occupying an area of no greater than 20 square centimetres, to be calculated by measuring around the outline of the trade mark and/or name and to include the space between trade mark and/or name if both are carried. Such trade mark may appear once only on the shirt and once on the shorts.

b. The trade mark (i.e. logo) and/or name of the clothing manufacturer or a combination of same, may also appear on socks, providing that on each brand-new (unworn) sock it occupies an overall area no greater than 20 square centimetres (such area referring to the portion of the sock that is still visible when a football boot is being worn).

c. The emblem of the Club (i.e. badge, name, initials or nickname, or a combination of such), providing it is of an area no greater than 100 square centimetres. Such emblem may appear once only on the front of the shirt and once anywhere on the shorts. The emblem may also appear once only on the collar or collar zone of the shirt, provided that it occupies an area no greater than 50 square centimetres.

d. The emblem of the Club (i.e. badge, name, initials or nickname, or a combination of such), may also appear on socks, providing that on each brand-new (unworn) sock it occupies an area no greater than 50 square centimetres (such area referring to the portion of the sock that is still visible when a football boot is being worn).

e. Players’ numbers and/or (where association, league and/or competition rules so permit) the players’ names.

f. Subject to having obtained (where applicable) the prior permission from the appropriate authority, the recognised badge or emblem of the appropriate association, league and/or competition, where the rules of the association, league and/or competition require such a badge or emblem to be placed on the Club’s playing kit.

This Rule 125 (Advertising) may only be altered or rescinded by resolution of at least two thirds of the members who vote in person or by proxy at a general meeting."

For - 91%
Against - 9%

 

Belter.
Wish more teams kept it simple like this.

 

If company x offered FC United 5 million over five seasons, I suspect that their constitution would be altered sharpish.