1. Having trouble logging in by clicking the link at the top right of the page? Click here to be taken to the log in page.
    Dismiss Notice

11th Anniversary September 11th

Discussion in 'TalkCeltic Pub' started by Gourlay1967, Sep 11, 2012.

Discuss 11th Anniversary September 11th in the TalkCeltic Pub area at TalkCeltic.net.

  1. Galileo

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2012
    Messages:
    290
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Los Alamos
    I have seen that link before, when I too believed the government was behind 9/11 but in the full testimony its quite clear they were saying it sounded like bombs, when the towers were burning the crash of bodies and debris on the street sounded like a bomb
     
  2. Galileo

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2012
    Messages:
    290
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Los Alamos
    alot of debris hit building, including some that sheared off an entire chunk of one edge, and the fire had spread to almost all floors http://www.911myths.com/assets/images/ZafarWTC7.jpg also there was no pyroclastic dust cloud, that is a myth, so is the notion of nasa imagery showing molten steel under ground zero, please of you could find these pictures it would be great, you should also remember that debris continued to burn under the wreckage for weeks after, but thats very different from molten steel, also this fema appendix C stuff has been made up by several websites but none of them have ever been able to show a verified version of it
     
  3. ladbroke8

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2008
    Messages:
    3,293
    Likes Received:
    2,046
    You must be a pro debunker if you deny what FEMA documented and all the workers who seen pools of molten steel during clearup including firemen. Also molten metal is flowing out of the south tower before collapse.

    If there are any pieces of evidence to be skeptical of it's hijackers passport in the debris and bandanas at shanksville.
     
  4. Sean Daleer Ten Thirty Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2011
    Messages:
    77,144
    Likes Received:
    39,531
    I haven't looked at that link you quoted but there was one fireman who said he was blown off his feet by an explosion in the foyer of one of the towers.

    I always thought that was strange.
     
  5. ladbroke8

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2008
    Messages:
    3,293
    Likes Received:
    2,046

    There are many many people who heard and felt explosions in all 3 towers, basenents, lobby and several floors beliw impact point.

    The Naudet footage show destruction in the libby and large marble panels blown off walls.

    Also during the collapse of the twin towers there are explosive ejections way below the collapse point.

    Debunkers will try and.dismiss.this as coincidence

    Firefighters will tell you that people got fractured bones etc in the basement when explosions were going off.
     
  6. ladbroke8

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2008
    Messages:
    3,293
    Likes Received:
    2,046
    Heres a video compilation from the news and at the scene.
    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWgSaBT9hNU&feature=youtube_gdata_player"]9/11 Revisited: Were explosives used? - YouTube[/ame]
     
  7. Professor Green

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2012
    Messages:
    440
    Likes Received:
    0
    I thought this video was a real eye opener:

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvay28lZiHU"]Mysterious Deaths of 9/11 Witnesses (MUST SEE) - YouTube[/ame]
     
  8. Heb Celt

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2010
    Messages:
    12,188
    Likes Received:
    3,103
    How do they know that the fractured bones were from explosions?If the towers were rigged with demolition charges,would they not have started collapsing from the bottom and not exactly below where the planes impacted?
     
  9. ladbroke8

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2008
    Messages:
    3,293
    Likes Received:
    2,046

    One would assume that if youre planning to sell a plane crash-collapse story the collapse would have to be from impact point.

    Its a question that leads you deeper into the planning and execution of the days events. Thats a side that comes after you know what theyre telling you cannot be true.

    The implications of it being an inside job make it the far scarier prospect. If the whole thing was planned, powerful people are planning and working against us for their own hidden agenda. The media are repeating what they want you to think really happened and setting a stern tone of riddicule towards any skeptics.

    It took a lot to pull this off and just about get away with it. Its was a psyop that decived the masses.

    Notice that people use the term 'conspiracy theory' as a wacky genre of entertainment. I wonder what institutions have influenced the public to think conspiracy means 'a wacky alternative to the truth'
     
  10. B0B0BALDE

    Joined:
    May 12, 2011
    Messages:
    474
    Likes Received:
    0
    Slight exaggeration.

    In your opinion, besides, who says they didn't notice? As I said, workmen in an office is not an uncommon sight, most, would barely notice them. The security, of course would be an issue but I am hardly suggesting they walked in there with semtex and thermite written on the side of there equipment.

    We had fibre optics installed recently, half the office floor was out of action and I could barely hear myself think with them hammering, sawing and drilling away. I didn't say to my boss, do you think they guys are planting bombs? What exactly are you expecting people to notice? The work could of taken place over months, maybe even years and been imbedded with other, legitimate, tasks, like e.g. electrical and plumbing all of which require drilling and laying wires as you mention.
     
  11. pod

    Joined:
    May 19, 2010
    Messages:
    7,881
    Likes Received:
    3
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SiEVzlIfSXk
     
  12. Higgie

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2012
    Messages:
    6,457
    Likes Received:
    6
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 29, 2013
  13. Galileo

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2012
    Messages:
    290
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Los Alamos
  14. Galileo

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2012
    Messages:
    290
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Los Alamos
    not an exageration at all, in addition to the WTC buildings themselves you also had a shopping center underneath plus the subway and path trains, and that amount of workmen would be an uncommon sight, and you actually think they would just leave explosives lying in the building over a period of months or years? The WTC was one of the most secure buildings in the world and planting explosives is nothing like laying fiber optic cable http://www.cracked.com/article_15740_was-911-inside-job.html
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 17, 2012
  15. Galileo

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2012
    Messages:
    290
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Los Alamos
    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tacYjsS-g6k"]9/11 Debunked: Controlled Demolition Not Possible - YouTube[/ame]
     
  16. Rude Bhoy

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Messages:
    5,295
    Likes Received:
    8
    Location:
    Béal Feirste & Doire
    Fav Celtic Player:
    Kris Commons
    Fav Celtic Song:
    Over and Over
    Or maybe you could just stop posting irrelevant pish?
     
  17. Sean Daleer Ten Thirty Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2011
    Messages:
    77,144
    Likes Received:
    39,531
  18. Galileo

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2012
    Messages:
    290
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Los Alamos
    Fuel and debris from the crash and the collapse came down on building 7, and there was a fire burning throughout the entire building, it has spread to almost every floor when they pulled the firefighters out
     
  19. ladbroke8

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2008
    Messages:
    3,293
    Likes Received:
    2,046
    Again more "create your own conspiracy then debunk it"

    "There was no evidence for controlled demolition"

    The building went into free fall from standing, this cannot happen due to fire and a prigressuve collapse.

    In terms of noise if your planning to bring these buildings down making it look like structural failure youre hardly going to use standard explosives.
     
  20. ladbroke8

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2008
    Messages:
    3,293
    Likes Received:
    2,046
    debris damged all buildings in the surrounding area. fuel? NIST said the fuel from the "jets" would have burnt off quickly. Ive never heard a debunker claim fuel fell from the north tower into WTC 7, youre clearly working overtime!