Is Anyone Else Getting Fed Up With The Conspiracy Nonsense?

Mate for the sake of my sanity would you please answer me one question honestly. Are you on the wind up?

 

Wind up? Dallas was sacked no?

Serious question, all I want is a yes or no answer. Was Hooper offside?

 

To be honest mate your sanity's probably no there anymore with all the conspiracys flying around your head.

 

Im getting fed up with hun * refereeing in Scotland and going into games hoping the Refs dont cost us more points and wins.

Foreign Refs for me.

 

Sorry, can you put it what you want me to answer in a straight simple question? All I see is you asking for proof of an agenda that in my opinion doesn't exist. If it doesn't exist, there wouldn't be proof. So there is my proof.

 

so its ok to give a * scandalous decision against celtic cause ki missed a couple of sitters , the daily record brainwashing claims another victim

 

Can you not see that you're arguing with yourself in your own post. You clearly state there has been no agenda, then cite the Dallas fiasco??? Can you really not see how ridiculous that makes you look? Really? Denying there is any agenda then saying you would like to see those that may be guilty treated the same way Dallas was.


Edit: Forgot to anwer the Hooper question.

The call was so tight that it has taken numerous replays to even suggets he is off and the remit given to officials is to favour the attacking player. He was at best a ball hair off and to use this in comparison to a ridiculous penalty award and two clear red card offences for Black is pathetic.

You do realise that there has never been a recorded incident of mass paranoia in history. Ever. Yet there are many on here, backed up by many not here both professional and fans who agree with my train of thought yet you call me paranoid and a conspiracist. I have posted proven evidence of said agenda and you still choose to ignore it and you doubt my sanity. Hopefully one day you will be intelligent enough to realise your stupidity

 

You've read through this thread and seen no evidence of an Anti-Celtic, Anti-Irish, Anti-Catholic or Anti-Lennon agenda in the history of Scottish Football? Then we disagree.

 

Actually I don't buy newspapers, and did I say that it was okay to give a scandolous decision because Ki missed the sitters? No.

I said if Ki had burried those, we would have won and not been in this prediciment where we turn to blaming refs. This is you twisting my words.

Brainwashing? No. It's called not being paranoid because in honesty a fair bit of bad decisions have went against us. But if I were to be brainwashed into anything it would be that the referees hate Celtic and meet up to plot ways to get us beat.

I'm not arguing with anyone mate, I'm trying to discuss my point of view with fellow Celtic supporters. If it was an agenda why was Dallas sacked and not just suspended and given a slap on the wrist.

It is your opinion that there is an agenda, and mine that there is not. A lot of people on this forum seem to think it's okay to get there point across and when anyone else does, attacks the user, tries to make him look stupid for not believing in this agenda, or aims the coversation towards them not being a Celtic supporter because there view is different from theirs.

Like I said before, it remains a conspiracy theory until it has been proven and brought into light. If you guys have all this proof then please, in a non sarcastic way, contact footballs governing bodies with it and get it dealt with. But like I said before, it is my opinion that things go for us that shouldn't also, fair enough the odds do seem stacked against us for for/against bad decisions but this happens.

If there is an agenda, I would love nothing more than for it to be uncovered and taken down. But I don't think there is. You do.

If it get's uncovered and more proof apart from Dallas being sacked and on the field decisions then my mind might yet be changed. But for now this is my opinion.

 

Ah, they meet up to "plot"? Don't think anyone has suggested that my friend. Is that an attempt to ridicule the people asking questions? I think it may well be, nice try but it's a sure sign of an argument with no weight when you start that.

 

Again I would say that yes, I have seen things. Times have changed and to critisce a referee of being against Celtic because he doesn't like catholics and seems to be part of a bunch of plotting referees to take down the Irish Catholic football club Celtic just seems all too ludicrous to me. My opinion though.

 

I find it absolutley hilarious that people deny Referees are dodgy.

If I was a Ref I would be biased to Celtic and against Rangers, so would anyone I know for their team. Unless Refs were Robots who didnt like football or support a team so will they.

 

Nope. I am merely trying to find another way to find out how all these different referees seem to have the same hatred of Celtic. Is it a coincidence? You tell me? Either it is coincidence or planned and plotted?

 

Wasn't the chief exec of the SFA getting sacked for purposely holding back the Cadete transfer so that he couldn't play against Rangers good enough evidence for you? The CHIEF EXEC of the * SFA.

 

You all seem to be trying to throw your opinions down my throat. Like I said, it's only my opinion. You don't have to take it. I am just discussing the fact that I don't beleive there is an agenda. You all seem to be taking offense to what I'm saying?

It's only my opinion, who am I to tell you what to beleive, I am just saying my point of view. Take it or leave it, not meaning to cause any offence here.

 

sh4rk3y why were the 5 others who were sacked over the email that hugh dallas sent all reinstated people seem to forget all about them because they aren't in the public eye so could you please explain that

 

Couldn't tell you, maybe the agenda? Maybe not. Once again it's my opinion that there is no conspiracy against us. Why not write to FIFA and ask them they might have an explination?

 

So because he was sacked that means there was no agenda to limit Celtic's chances? Makes no sense. He was exposed, his position was untenable because of Fergus' efforts but it still happened. Do you think this was the only time he tried to hamper Celtic and he just happened to be caught? Of course not, do you think his colleagues were completely unaware of his actions and views? Of course not. There's you're evidence.

 

As the original poster I'd just like to clarify that I'm not saying there is no bias against Celtic within the SFA, what I'm saying is that I'm getting fed up with it being used as an excuse after virtually every defeat.

The penalty decision at the weekend is simply deflecting from the fact that we didn't deserve to win the game. Hearts were the better side.

Lennons tactics in the league cup final and last weekends semi-final were way off.

It's difficult to blame the man personally, because he came into the job with no experience at all. He was the cheap option.

I have always, and will continue to blame our board for appointing such an inexperienced manager in the first place. They should have put the money down and got someone with more experience for the job.