1. Having trouble logging in by clicking the link at the top right of the page? Click here to be taken to the log in page.
    Dismiss Notice

Who is better guns n roses or Nirvana?

Discussion in 'TC Media' started by ThisIsGhod, Jan 26, 2012.

  1. the winger

    the winger

    Messages:
    226
    no contest g n r by a country mile nirvana 1 good song :shamrock:
     
  2. Belfast-hoops

    Belfast-hoops

    Messages:
    1,692
    Location:
    Belfast
    Nirvana without a doubt for me.
     
  3. OC

    OC

    Messages:
    5,751
    G'n'R if I had to chose, but not really a fan of either band.

    Pearl Jam/Alice in Chains/Nirvana would've been better options, Seattle bands, same genre and all that.

    Ooooh controversy. Agreed.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 26, 2012
  4. Seosamh Máirtín

    Seosamh Máirtín

    Messages:
    16,464
    Location:
    Purgatory
    Nirvana are the most overrated band in existence.
     
  5. Seosamh Máirtín

    Seosamh Máirtín

    Messages:
    16,464
    Location:
    Purgatory
    Since when does YT determine a superior artist? :56:

    Here's a couple for you:

    Justin Bieber (Mistletoe) - 93.8m views
    Rebecca Black (Friday) - 30m

    :97:
     
  6. Guns N Roses
     
  7. Conor1888

    Conor1888

    Messages:
    3,343
    Location:
    Belfast/Ireland
    Guns n roses
     
  8. Taz

    Taz Blind Justice Gold Member News Writer

    Messages:
    29,509
    Location:
    ...In Exile
    That is like comparing Metallica to the Clash. It is 2 completely different styles. G'n'R should be compared with other LA 'Hair' bands, like Motley Crue & Poison etc, whilst Nirvana compared with the likes of Soundgarden, Mudhoney & Pearl Jam etc.
     
  9. ThisIsGhod

    ThisIsGhod

    Messages:
    5,196
    Location:
    Glasgow
    If nirvana are overrated then how come one of their albums is the most sold of all time.
    Nevermind 10 million copies sold
     
  10. ThisIsGhod

    ThisIsGhod

    Messages:
    5,196
    Location:
    Glasgow
    Sorry correction one of the most sold of all time.
     
  11. Matt_20

    Matt_20

    Messages:
    3,682
    Location:
    Bishopbriggs
    Mainly listened to Guns N Roses in my youth, would have to say Nirvana were better though. Still though the original Guns lineup would feature above Nirvana on the list of bands I would go and see live if I could time travel.
     
  12. Fiferbhoy1991

    Fiferbhoy1991

    Messages:
    6,753
    Location:
    SSR Fife
    Record sales do not talent make. all it proves is that they have a huge machine behind them fronting their music. case in point - Justin Bieber and Lil Wayne

    i'll need to abstain from this vote because i really hate them both. i think if they weren't so overhyped i reckon i could bear nirvana if not for the hypw, but i cant bear hear folk talk about kobain as if he was a genius. they were ok

    and as for g 'n' r, again they are no bad but why the 28 week guitar solos for no fathomable reason? and again hugely overrated
     
  13. Seosamh Máirtín

    Seosamh Máirtín

    Messages:
    16,464
    Location:
    Purgatory
    Guns n Roses have far, far more range to their music. For example, can you imagine Nirvana covering a Paul McCartney song? Idea is laughable.

    Love this:

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8JjVPiDLdH4"]Guns N' Roses-Live and Let Die W/Lyrics - YouTube[/ame]
     
  14. Seosamh Máirtín

    Seosamh Máirtín

    Messages:
    16,464
    Location:
    Purgatory
    Someone needs to have a re-listen to Nirvana, haha. The guys, such as Nirvana, that were involved in the grunge movement had so much in common with 'metal' bands.

    And Nirvana were far more famous, and ridiculous looking, than GnR's ever were. Do you even know what 'pop' means?

    It's quite simple = popular.

    As a poster earlier said, Nirvana have one of the best selling albums of all time. GnR's never reached their heights.
     
  15. TyroneBhoy

    TyroneBhoy

    Messages:
    2,384
    Location:
    Tír Eoghain
    My favorite version of that song.

    For me its the Guns. I dont think Nirvana would have been as big as they are if Kurt didnt bite the bullet. A couple of good songs and thats about it.
     
  16. Matt_20

    Matt_20

    Messages:
    3,682
    Location:
    Bishopbriggs
    lolwut? The main reason he killed himself was because he couldn't cope with the amount of success they had. They were pretty * big.
     
  17. mygirlmaria

    mygirlmaria

    Messages:
    19,140
    Location:
    Edinburgh
    I think they were both quite good, but both overhyped!
     
  18. TyroneBhoy

    TyroneBhoy

    Messages:
    2,384
    Location:
    Tír Eoghain
    Aye im not saying that they didnt have big success, but alot of people talk about them as one of the best bands of all time. IMO they were average and if he didnt kill himself they would have broke up shortly after and been remebered as a decent band. Thats my opinion anyway.
     
  19. Seosamh Máirtín

    Seosamh Máirtín

    Messages:
    16,464
    Location:
    Purgatory
    No denying his death had an impact on their success, sad though that may be. Kurt wasn't exactly a sane individual. They were 'getting' big, sure, but they certainly hadn't cracked the egg.
     
  20. Seán_67

    Seán_67

    Messages:
    5,940
    Location:
    Teenage Wasteland
    They did cover a Bowie song very well though (The Man Who Sold The World).

    Personal preference is Nirvana, though I actually quite like both bands. :50: