Samaras or McCourt?

I'd start me Mam over him :icon_mrgreen::icon_mrgreen::icon_mrgreen:

 

paddy obv

 

Paddy without doubt.

 

Paddy McCourt. The other one is a diddy.

 

paddy mccourt has a * army.


samaras has an army of people who dont like him.

can you guess who i voted for?




















gary caldwell haha chuckle

 

Paddy. His talent is ridiculous. The best footballer in the league.

 

paddy,,enought said ,,slan

 

They would seem to both be on form so why not play both? Samaras gives the team a bit more strength obviously but McCourt is the better option for breaking teams down.

 

Never.

 

Samaras on the wing against physical sides like Rangers, McCourt would probably get injured in 5 minutes.

 

Really? Paddy McCourt has played against Rangers before and never got injured once.

 

Your Samaras love is pathetic. Just like his ability. Twice in the past two games he's tried to pass inside and it's been easily intercepted and allowed the opposition to run at our defence. A criminal offence. His *-ups of the easiest things in the game are too often.

Why does he insist on bringing 9 out of 10 high balls down with his chest?

It's bizarre that you'd so boldly claim that McCourt's footballing ability isn't superior to everyone else's in the SPL. He's ridiculously talented in that aspect. His flaws lie elsewhere.

 

What I said has nothing to do with my post. McCourt is nowhere near the best player in the league.

 

* no!

 

There's more to fOOtball than dribbling. The rest of his game is pretty shocking, had it not been for that dribbling, which most the time fails because he doesn't pass enough,he would still be playing in Ireland

 

I said he's the best 'footballer' in the league. Which he is. Followed closely by Emilio. Who's better than them?

 

Everyone seems to forget that McCourt started on Thursday and done * all.

Lets just use him as a substitute for now.

 

When you say 'footballer' what do you mean?

 

I thought he done well on Thursday, a solid 7 performance. He just didn't do anything very spectacular, hence fans thinking he done '* all'

Kept possesion very well.

 

Disagree. His passing and shooting are very good. He may not pass enough but he's got the ability to play very good passes and he's proven it before.

Would you pass to someone inferior when you know for a fact that you can drive into the box with your dribbling skills and make something happen.

It doesn't come off sometimes admittedly but he offers something different. Defenders * themselves when he gets the ball. That's got to better than him picking it up and passing back to Kayal or Wanyama who'll then pass it to Forrest, who'll then pass it back to Matthews who'll play it inside to Majstorovic who'll launch it to nobody.