Peadophile ring smashed by cops

what a pile of pish that.

 

it is merely a suggestion. why dont you tell us yours?

psychometrics? measuring knowledge, abilities and attitudes..i dont think so.

well how well are the parents looking after the children, if they are being abused by someone else? those who abuse and are not the parent, are no less accountable than those who do.

as i said there should be severe harsh laws, against abuse of all forms.

 

and your solution is the death penalty?

you tell me how that address the root cause of abuse.

 

Highly ilogical and unethical.

 

how about you elaborate.

 

Do you honestly think the governments are going to foot the bill for every parent, soon to be parent and possibly a parent in the future to have phsycological evaluations as to wether they would be good parents?

They would then have to pass laws on banning people from becoming parents, possibly forcing contraception on them based on these tests.....which is unethical wether you believe it or not....everyone has the right to become parents.

And what if these tests are wrong? And you are discriminating against people pro-creating based on faulty results of some Jeremy Kyle-esque experiment!

 

Celtic Serbia......where would these assessments stop ?

Parents,what about others who have contact with kids.

Doctors,Nurses,Bus Drivers,Taxi Drivers,Teachers.
Thats just a few to start with,your idea is a non starter.

* who are found guilty,should be skinned to the bone and rolled in salt,then executed.

This might deter others from following suit.

 

+ 1

 

im not the govt, so i cannot answer that one.

are there not laws now 'banning things'?

yes everyone has the right to become parents, however they lose that right if they abuse their children or any form of abuse. Are there not laws restraining perpretrators from victims in other cases, such as violence?

yeah what if those tests are wrong. then again depends what tests they use..the only other way is harsher laws, though like i said the govt care more about if you do a bank than they care about children.

 

I agree. The laws that are in place are nothing short of ridiculous. Only in humanity can it be considered worse to rob a ban than it is to * young children, force them into sexual acts whilst robbing them of their innocence and mental well-being

 

it was merely a suggestion, it seems people would think im a govt minister.

nothing has started, so how can it stop.

yes they exist, though from what ive seen its the re offenders..and the govt services are inadequate for those who seek help.

so where would the executions stop? it doesn't address the root cause of abuse just a negative punishment. it may deter others, though their sick desire would out itself one way or another.

 

No one thinks you are Government Minister.Thankfully.

I was asking a question about your idea,where it would stop.

But as you think you are being a smart * with your answer to that,i cant be bothered discussing it with you anymore.

 

the more you kill? the less it will happen.

 

it was a suggestion, adults lose the right to children when they mistreat them, any form of abuse.

like i said human rights should only be curtailed when it directly harms someone else. better prevention programs and more funding from the govt would be a start..but they wont do it.

 

and countries with the death penalty, have a lower crime rate?

 

i hardly think adding shop lifting and stealing cars on the list of folk to get th death penalty somehow. you are completely not understanding what is said in this thread. you think its good to do things like what they * do? no thats correct. you harpe on about parents getting tests! * you mental? you think its always parents that do this? once again no. there are sick * all over the place who will keep on doing this to innocent children wrecking lives and so on.while this * world gives the sinners more protection than the victims! do you think thats right? death penalty is a way to rid * like them and doing it asap the better for me.

 

I'm afraid I don't think there's a way to prevent first time pedos from abusing kids. it's impossible to say who is gonna be a (first time) pedo.

So many times they get away with it, just because their victims are too embarrassed or afraid to tell anyone what happened (similar cases -> raped women).

Gladly our times have changed, more and more victims find the strength to come out and tell what was done to them. back in the day people didn't really believe their kids when they told they had been sexually abused by their uncles/grandpas/dads etc. it seemed like they had absolutely no say. the society is willing to listen to kids these days, unfortunately still a lot are unable to talk about the horrific crimes that happened to them.

However, pedos are usually serial offenders. It's absolutely possible to prevent non-first-time pedos from abusing kids: by locking them up (till they die) or kill them.

Every time I read in the news that kids were abused by a previously convicted pedo I could cry.

 

no, any form of abuse is wrong.

Im a psychology student, i think i have a right to say my piece, its not my own opinion, its knowledge from having tutors and lecturers whom i have personally spoken to about topics such as this and they worked with both abuse victims and aggressors alike.

ive stated the govt dont do enough, to protect children. ive stated it more than once in this thread.

are you saying im somehow giving pedophiles leeway? my *. i think you should re read that again. or explain yourself. If thats what i think it is.