juarez dive!?

thanks , I notice you failed to answer my question. well done.

had juarez got the guy sent off then yes. Fundementally it's on the same level. Just because what laughatme done was more laugh out loud funny than Juarez doesn't mean it's any better to see.

 

Funny how nothing was said about the killie player that slid in 2 feet up with studs showing, that's worse than simulation it's down right nasty.

Juarez probably thought "he has just tried to do me, and we are winning so I'm going to milk this"

 

I do believe you're right. After all, it's part of the Latin football philosphy.

 

totally agree.cheating is cheating no matter how you sugar coat it

 

Definately know where you're coming from, think i may've made a similar argument about the McGeady incident and I'm sure I've definately been more biased about situations in the past than you're being here, but come on: Juarez acted like a pure fud and was completely out of order.

 

Anyone got video of the dive?

 

Spot on, as genuinely annoyed as i am about Juarez's behaviour I'm relieved to be reminded that it pales in comparison to the drudgery of mordor!

 

shouldnt of went down so easy if it was a killie player i wudov sed he dived !!

 

Jiko put a video up of "ze incident" on the first page.

 

Explain how he could have stopped.. You do realise that slow motion gifs are exactly that , a slowed down image of what really happened , and as you probably noticed from the tv footage at the time both him and the Kilmarnock player were going at full pelt so how does he stop and not go to ground..

I swear that post I have quoted is just one complete post and not bits and pieces taken from posts , as you claimed..

 

he could have not went into the challage hows that for you! he could have slowed down you can see he was not gona get there first hows that for you buddy have a look on the tv then not in slow mo will show the same

you could also say he did not need to roll around like he had been shot when there was no contact, also that post was to show a good few posts what happend...... so please rmemeber that

but thanks again for clearing that up for me nice one mate

 

I see a flaw.. He does get there first.. He gets his toe to the ball before the Kilmarnock player cuts across him..

Of course he could have just bottled out of going for the ball as you say...

 

am sorry you don't agree with me yet again mate, but you see somthing i don't fair enough

but he did not stop and he went down with no contact and looks like a mug for a bad dive and he got a player a yellow card for that

but it seems you think that players sould do this instead

 

At the end of the day he dived he should not do it , but at the same time if he had won a pen and won us the game no one would have cared , A Naka dive v st Mirren a few years back won us a free kick a goal that really sealed us the title .
It's in his culture to dive he was taught it at a young age and its ok to do it in his Culture here its not but its creeping into the game faster with the amount of players from abroad.

 

Why the its in his Culture to dive like it is for the likes of south american and north american players , and european players.

 

he was brought up to dive?really?

 

The last gif was every 3 frames.. This one is every frame.. He's not in control of the ball but it's clear he got a touch on the ball.. The ref can't make a judgement on what has happenned from his position so my take on it is the linesman sees the touch on the ball , signals a foul to us and the ref reacts that it's a yellow card offence based on Juarez over reacting.. I have no problem with Juarez going to ground or us getting the foul.. Just the over reaction..

 

More or less yeah. Over here (Spain) you see youngsters making the biggest meal out of fouls.