1. Having trouble logging in by clicking the link at the top right of the page? Click here to be taken to the log in page.
    Dismiss Notice

Jimmy Bullard;

Discussion in 'Transfer Rumours' started by holy pope, Apr 25, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. m45

    m45

    Surely they wouldn't publish such detailed quotes attributed to Adam Pearson (Hull Director) if he hasn't actually said them. Don't you get sued for that sort of this - this is mental!!!
     
  2. why would hull pay his full wages then let him play for another team. would't they just keep him???????????????????
    they wont be lettin him off with the 100k fine and that is what mr pearson has been quoted on
     
  3. I'm still in chok reading this.
    Why do he think Hull City want to sent him to Glasgow for a season and then demand his wages in Hull City to be payed also?
    Obvious Hull City would never let that happens, so why was he in Glasgow in the first place?
    If true, the deal have been dead from the first second.

    "It's purely a football decision for me, it's not about money - not to me at least, although it might be for them,"

    I don't get it. It makes no sense.
     
  4. Chill out folks. I'm sure Lennon is well aware
    Of the true position
     
  5. I dont pay much attention to what has been said. They have quoted stuff from Pearson but how many times do the press twist comments made.

    I think this is alot of rubbish. We could still see him at CP IMO
     
  6. Someone is being less than honest. Bullard said its about football.
    Well it appears now to be more about money. If we are not doing a deal then move on to alternatives, he would have been an intreresting adddition but there will be others.
     
  7. he must be pretty dumb if he thought he could get his full salary from Hull and another salary from celtic, wonder if the quotes are actually true.
    still if its not an option, fine lets move onto the next target.
     
  8. cant see him thinking he'd get full pay off Hull (45k) as well as the loan wages when the entire reason for the move is to save Hull money. Surely he wouldnt expect them to still pay for him but not have him it would defy logic.

    Ill reserve judgement till later
     
  9. with whats getting said in the papers i for 1 would rather we didnt sign him just being a gready *
     
  10. Bullard is definitely a *.
     
    Why because of a newspaper report. In that case you are a *. If we are basing it on what has been written.

    If he signs is he still a *?

    I just dont get some fans.
     
  11. theres no way this can be true . is it not the case celtic are MAYBE only paying 15-20 k a week and hull aint prepared to put in the other 25-30 ?
     
  12. If this is true, the guy is deluded ! 14 appearances in 2 seasons and he wants 75k a week. Get a * grip Jimmy !
     
  13. Its just been on SSN and Johann said that there was no news at all. The team are just leaving for the US
     
  14. he apparently is gonna get 75k a week, if he signs.
    thought he was better than that
     
  15. No Joe Ledley with the team?
     
  16. aye, leds is coming
     
  17. "But now it seems Jimmy wants extra cash on top as well and he has jeopardised the chance to play for a great club. Who would not want to play at Celtic, with a chance of European football and silverware?
    "Hull City[​IMG] were prepared to subsidise a year in Glasgow for Bullard. Let's just say we would have made a significant contribution to the overall wage package.
    "But unless he has a dramatic change of heart overnight, we expect him back here rather than being in the United States with Celtic. He has had four weeks to make up his mind and has strung people along, frankly."




    Please, Please, Please let this be true - I'd almost rather this was true than us signing the mexican lad.


    I don't want Bullard anywhere near us!
     
  18. Ledley was not with the team at the airport, but neither was Lenny maybe staying behind to conclude the deal and fly out later or tomorrow morning.

    The figures being announced in the papers are obviously rubbish. The thing is that Hull were obviously not interested in paying as much as what Bullard wanted.

    The thing we have to look at is the fact that JB has a contract at Hull for 45k a week. Now we are willing to pay him 30k so Hull should pay 15k, they must not want to pay the 15k. Now Joe is under contract why would he want to leave for less money. Its common sense that if you are under contract you are not going to go for less money on a loan. Im sorry but I back him. I think that Hull have to change their offer for this deal to go through.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.